Support the Pathetic Annual Telethon

I give up. The previous links didn't work. Please use this button instead.

Memorial Day Golf or Additional evidence of the Media's Bush/Obama double standard


Seems like every Republican blogger, tweeter, and facebooker has picked up the item about Obama and his Memorial Day golf outing. In fact, Google the words "Memorial Day Obama Golf" and you'll see the same article come up again and again. Here's a representative sentence from the article everyone, including the Torah-true scholars at Matzav, have reposted:
The decision to golf on Memorial Day invites comparison with President George W. Bush, who gave up the game early in his presidency and said he did it out of respect for the families of those killed in Iraq.
Scant mention is given to Obama's other activities yesterday, which included a ceremony in Arlington National Cemetery and a visit with some of  the families of those killed in battle.

Those fair and unbiased reporters at Fox also picked up the story, for fair and unbiased reasons, of course:


And how exactly did Bush spend his last Memorial Day in office? Not golfing of course, but bike riding: From USA Today, May 26, 2008:
Bush was at the White House through 3 p.m., the time he asked Americans to pause for a moment to remember the fallen. Then, he went to a Secret Service training facility in Beltsville, Md., just outside Washington, to ride his mountain bike for about 90 minutes.
And the difference between golfing and bike-riding is... what exactly?

After the jump see the definitive comment on Bush and his giving up golf, including absolute proof that he lied about it. Despitre claiming that he gave up golf in May of 2003 footage exists of W playing the game on Columbus Day (!!) 2003.


On the heroism of the New Square burn victim




Unfortunately, I can't understand a word of this. A little help please?

By my lights, this man, Aaron Rottenberg, is a hero in the tradition of Pharaoh's daughter who disregarded her father's evil decree and saved the baby Moses. Society said let the child drown. She chose to follow her conscious and save him instead. He is also a hero in the way Matisyahu the 2nd century BCE Jewish priest was a hero. Rather then bow to the pressure of authorities who insisted on conformity, Rottenberg went his own way, consequences be damned. Matisyahu started a revolt. The daughter of Phraoah raised a son who fearlessly spoke truth to power. If Rottenberg is unable to ferment a Macabbee-style rebellion against the corrupt powers of New Square, let his example at least inspire a new wave of civil resisters who refuse to be bullied into choosing between their ideals and their community.

What Rottenberg wanted was simply to live as he saw fit, in his own home, in his own neighborhood,  surrounded by his family and friends. The monsters of New Square said he couldn't have both. They said he had to live by rules enforced by a mob, or uproot himself and his family and move to another neighborhood. This is an unconscionable choice, and one no one should be forced to make. I hope other Rottenbergs are waiting in the wings, ready to pick up his baton, and ready to say this isn't Judaism or Hasidut and that we refuse to accept it.

Can Republicans win without lying?


The question of the day is can Republicans win without lying? I ask because for the last ten years at least the Republican strategy in presidential campaigns has been to attach some outrageous falsehood to the Democratic party's candidate. Examples:

Memorial Day


Was I supposed to do something today? Was I suppose to think certain thoughts and perfrom certain rituals? Or did the day belong to me to do with it as I saw fit?

I took some heat earlier on the comment thread of another post for revealing that I planned to celebrate Memorial Day with a barbque. Is that fair? A legal holiday isn't a Jewish holiday, it carries no obligations. Jewish holidays are heavy with Meaning and Purpose. Legal holidays aren't - unless you, of your own volition, choose to weigh them down.

Earlier, I was chastized for disrespecting the soldiers. That's unfortunate. I honestly believe that if our soldiers died for anything, it was to free us from the obligation of agreeing about what has Meaning and what has Purpose. We honor the soldiers and their sacrfice not with ceremonies, but with our freedom. What's more valuable than freedom of conciousness?

Beyond that, it's a gift to be able to relax, away from work, with friends on a legal holiday. A gift. Yes, this gift coincides with a day set aside to honor dead soldiers, but the dead soldiers aren't all that give value to the day.

Another thought: Some of my friends work for Jews, and they were required to be at their desks today. No one is stingier with vacation days than a Jewish boss. If you work for a non-Jew, you're free to stay home on both yom tov, and the legal holidays and the world continues to spin on its axis. But Jewish bosses like to pretend that vacation on yom tov is a great gift, unknown in non-Jewish firms. They use this self-servbing fantasy as a cudgel to deny you other off-days. This sucks, so if you do work for Jews, you have my sympathy.



Click here to learn about how you can sell your products on Amazon and receive $75 in free clicks

El Al Flight 27: A Passenger's Account


A Guest Post By E. Fink

I urge everyone to read and share this very powerful essay written by one of the passengers on El Al Flight 27 last week.

The writer, Dr. Elman is a friend and his son married my cousin. (The essay is particularly moving for me because I know all the people in the story.)

Read it on OU.org: Touched By a Landing

(And share your comments here...)


Click here to learn about how you can sell your products on Amazon and receive $75 in free clicks

Mini review of three new seforim apps, plus a thought or two on the power of books


The first thing you see when you enter my living room is a book shelf crowded with Jewish volumes. Pride of place goes to the Talmud received from my father-in-law as a wedding gift. Right next to this set is my well-used mikraot gdolot edition of the tanach which I purchased at the YU bookfair several dozen years ago. The shelf above the Talmud holds the 14 volume mishna set I inherited from my grandfather. Below it is my collection of siddurim. One was a gift from my high school upon our graduation. Another was purchased at a little shop in mea shearim during my year of study in Jerusalem. A third has been prayed from nearly every day by one member of my family or another, and carries the signs of honest, fervent use on its cover and pages. Another type of blogger might tell you some of the stories that occasioned the most impassioned use of that siddur, but not me. You'll just have to use your imagination.

I mention all this because I have been asked to review three extraordinary new tools of Jewish study and devotion. The Rusty Brick siddur, which I used exclusivly during my recent secret missions, and the Crowded Room editions of the Tanach and Mishna. All three apps offer the convenience we've come to expect from an e-book. Contents are completely searchable, and the text is easy to read. Whistles and bells on the Mishna and Tanach include a wide variety of included exegetes, translations, and, on the Tanach, a "tikkun" display that permits you to use the app to prepare the kriah. Provide the Siddur with your location, and it will help you find the nearest minyanim, and provide you with the local zmanim. It also has a compass that points you to Jerusalem (though I can't confirm that it works when you're north of the city, or east of the Kotel.) And there is something undeniably awesome about being able to carry the main works of Jewish law, liturgy and literature in your back pack. Load these applications on to your iPhone or iPad and you will, in effect, have given yourself a portable bes madresh.

The only problem is one of sentiment. Thanks to these ingenious apps, my iPad can hold the words and the ideas of our ancestors but it can't replicate the power of a printed book. Each volume on my shelf has a story. I bought it somewhere. It was a gift from someone. I, or my father, or my grandfather, or my son, or my wife, or my daughter used it for this or that purpose. Upon entry to my house, visitors see them immediately and know that I value learning. Those books on my shelf set the tone for my house, and remind me of where I come from. An excellent app on a light and speedy iPad provides none of that.

So though I recognize the convineince of the e-seforim I will continue to collect books, just as we have continued to collect art and hang it on our walls even after it became possible to carry complete museums on our phones. Images and artifacts and icons are powerful in a way that words are not. If I want to know what hillel and shamai argued about I'll go to my iPad, but if I want to know what they argued about while also feeling some sense of communion with my past and my people, I'll reach for the books my father in law gave me.


Click here to learn about how you can sell your products on Amazon and receive $75 in free clicks

George W. Bush on retreating to the 67 lines


How quickly we forget

"While territory is an issue for both parties to decide, I believe that any peace agreement between them will require mutually agreed adjustments to the armistice lines of 1949 to reflect current realities and to ensure that the Palestinian state is viable and contiguous."
--- George W. Bush, Jan. 2008

Strange but when he said it, no one cried. IOIYR? The blatant double standard should make fair people sick.

HT C. Griffen

More Haredi Photo Altering


A guest post from G.A.

While not as incendiary as the recent “Where’s Hilary” episode, this is an interesting example of censorship. In some ways, it may even be more disturbing.

Video of Ben Nitay (Benjamin Netanyahu) about 35 years ago


A Guest Post By E. Fink

Several Facebook friends have linked this video and I decided to watch it.

This video is older than me. But in the video, Bibi is younger than I am now. I was very impressed with his erudition and clarity as well as poise. It's really amazing to see how almost the exact same issues were being discussed in 1977 as are being discussed today. Also, it's fascinating to see predictions and premonitions from over 3 decades ago with the benefit of 20/20 hindsight today. You also have to love his attempt to anglicize his name.

Share your thoughts in the comments. Enjoy.





Click here to learn about how you can sell your products on Amazon and receive $75 in free clicks

Square


Guest Post by NAME ON REQUEST

One of the two most scaring TV scenes I saw as a child was in the 1996 made for TV movie The Lottery. The basic premise is that a tiny American town has a cemetery filled with people who all seemed to have died on July 4th, each one in a different year. The movies protagonist, visiting to arrange a funeral for his dying father, sees this anomaly and sets out to uncover the villages secret. What he discovers and soon whiteness is that each July 4th the townsfolks get together in the square where a lottery is held with one ticket per family. The family whose ticket is pulled out of the bucket then proceeds to have a lottery perform amongst each of its members. The final winner is immediately surrounded by the people gathered and stoned to death.

This had such a horrible affect on me that I'm kind of shaking now writing this. (The other scene was, and I don't even know what it was from since I only saw it in passing, seemed to be an old British period piece with a bloody guillotine decapitation. Head falling into bucket, blood squirting everywhere, cheering peasants, death in all its glory.

While reading the details of the recent events in New Square I couldn't help but think of this movie and the crazed and sadisitic people who lived in Anytown USA. I'm not suggesting an exact equivalence here, obviously it wasn't the whole town that gathered to burn an entire family to death. However, it seems to me that there was an atmosphere of permissiveness to abuse and harass dissenter. You can find videos online from two years ago of people gathered outside this family's home scaring their children by screaming for them to vacate the town. I don't know if it's true but the video suggests that the Rabbi's son happened to drive by the crowd in middle of this craziness and did nothing to stop it.

I won't believe for one second that the Rabbi didn't know about the abuse of this family at the hands of the communities leaders; In fact he likely encouraged it. I am certain, however, that he had no knowledge of this recent attack, I just simply cannot believe that is the case, but wound't resposiblity lie at his feet if his inaction led to this climax?

New Square, a place I once spent a shabbos in many years ago, seems eerily familiar to the town in The Lottery. I know there is little comparison in facts and events but the closed community hiding secrets resulting in violence against its own is where the comparison is found for me. It's like a community of people who must have things their way and they will use any means necessary to end and eradicate the "threat." We will never really know what the community as a whole feels about this but it's fair to assume that its leadership represents it as a whole. Let the Rabbi pretend he has a spokesman and make a statement denoucing what happened. Not just for the benefit of the media, but directly to his followers. Anyone involved in a protest against this family over the last few years should be banned from the main shul. They can't kick people off their legally owned property, but they should put them into the equivalent of cherim. The local Beis Din issued a statement but it wasn't signed in the name of the Rabbi.

I may be completely off in my facts but this is just my impression of what happned two days later.

Netanyahu in the Oval Office


I've had bad web access for the last several days so I haven't been able to see Netanyahu's performance in the Oval Office. Well, now I have finally seen it, and, frankly, I'm disappointed. What was presented to me as a dressing down, or a lecture, was nothing of the sort. Speaking in his usual monotone, Netanyahu calmly said a few things everyone knows, thanked the president for being such a great friend, and confirmed that (contrary to the over-heated claims of RW lunatics)  Barak Hussein Obama is fully committed to the security of the state of Israel.

I saw no anger, no passion, or anything that might plausibly be considered rudeness. Whole thing here:



My 2 cents about Obama and the '67 border soundbite


Old news, I know, but due to my just concluded secret mission, I was not able to comment before now.

What seems perfectly obvious to me is that Obama did not call for Israel to return to the '67 borders. I say this because I paid attention to what the man actually said.

Here is the relevant quote:

"The borders of Israel and Palestine should be based on the 1967 lines with mutually agreed swaps, so that secure and recognized borders are established for both states."

This is not, by any stretch, a call for Israel to go back to the '67 border. As everyone has already said, such a demand  is unacceptable and Obama never made such a demand. 

What he said was this: "The borders of Israel and Palestine should be based on the 1967 lines with mutually agreed swaps, so that secure and recognized borders are established for both states."


Again:  "based on the 1967 lines with mutually agreed swaps..."


Again:  "based on the 1967 lines with mutually agreed swaps..."


Obama is not saying that he wants Israel to be as vulnerable or as insecure as it was before the 6 Day War, nor is he asking Israel to disown or destroy Jewish communities that have been built on the Arab side of the Green Line. He is simply saying that Israel must give up some land for every piece of land it annexes. This is a concept that every president since Bush Sr. has embraced, and a concept that was the premise of Bush Jr's famous 2004 letter to Ariel Sharon. Calling for mutually agreed swaps is neither new, nor radical, nor shocking, nor anti-Israel. Rather, land swaps are a way of ensuring that Israel remains both a Jewish and democratic state. When the president calls for mutually agreed swaps he is making a  real --_ and realistic --- expression of concern for the security of Israeli citizens.

I find it difficult to accept that even the most disingenuous, and biased Obama-hater might misconstrue the plain meaning of these words; unfortunately the commentary of the last few days suggests that disingenuous, and biased Obama-haters are without shame or limits to their mendacity.

Regular postings will resume later today


Is the funeral mechitza necessary?


A Guest Post By Rafi G

I am not sure what to think of this story - a woman is suing the chevra kadisha of Netanya, for 32,000 NIS, for "forcing" her and other women to stand separate from the men at the funeral of a friend.

Ynetnews has the story:
A resident of Netanya recently filed a suit for NIS 32,000 (roughly $9,000) against Chevra Kadisha after she was asked to stand separate from men in a funeral she attended. "This is discriminatory and is against our world view," she claimed.


Susan Ayad said that last January she attended the funeral of a close friend in a Netanya cemetery. As they gathered in the eulogy square the mourners were shocked discover that large planters dividing the floor into two parts.


"The rabbi holding the service on behalf of Chevra Kadisha asked the men to stand on one side of the partition and the women to stand on the other side," the claim stated.


"Despite the objection of many of the mourners we avoided causing a stir in light of the sensitivity of the event and reluctantly adhered the rabbi's instruction. I was also forced to move to the women's side and was separated from my acquaintances."


Insult and rage
Ayad claims the forced separation sparked feelings of humiliation, rage and insult. "I don't understand how in a public place such as a cemetery someone can order me where to stand just because I'm a woman."


She consequently filed a suit with the Netanya Small Claims Curt against Chevra Kadisha with the help of the Progressive Judaism Movement's legal aid services.


The claim states that the segregation does not only hurt women but all those present at cemeteries seeking to spend time with loved ones.


Ayad referred the court to Israel's anti-discrimination law which was the basis for a claim against bus segregation. She motioned the court to order Chevra Kadisha to pay NIS 31,900 in compensation.


Elements at the Progressive Judaism's pluralism center called on anyone who experienced a similar act of discrimination to approach them, suggesting there may be a more extensive campaign on the issue.
While a funeral is not really a prayer service, though kaddish is said, it is common to at least stand separately during the eulogies, though often that is without barriers placed demarcating the separation. It is also fairly common that there is no formal separation. It seems to generally be up to the discretion of the chevra kadisha and/or the family.

The article also does not say the family was or was not religious, nor does it say if the family wanted it or not. the only comment seems to be of a friend. I wonder if the family had wanted the separation, would she sue the family for forcing segregation upon her?

So, I don't know what to think. Is it right or wrong to have such a separation at a funeral? It is common, but must it be so? Is it cause for a lawsuit?

Click here to learn about how you can sell your products on Amazon and receive $75 in free clicks

Is Orthodox Judaism true? What does that mean?


A guest post by Philo

Since it's very quiet here today, I figured I'd find something to repost from my own blog that can be food for thought. This was originally posted (writing as Yehudi Hilchati) in 2 different posts (hence the discontinuity and slight repetition) on my blog in October 2007:

--------------------------------------------

Many skeptics on the Jblogosphere wrestle with the question "Is Orthodox Judaism true?"

Seems to me that they struggle with 2 questions and that each needs to be examined in a different light:

1) does God exist

2) if god exists, is OJ true?

Or break it down even further:

If God exists, what kind of God is he? Does he consciously rule the world or is all of existence just a sort of “side effect” of God’s being? Or does he take an active role?

If he takes an active role, did he actually command us to do all the things that the Torah lists or is that a human document by people who were striving for God?

Even if it’s not a totally human document, what level of input was there by God? Written by God, every word? Written by people interpreting the word of God? Written with ruach hakodesh or divine inspiration?

There’s a lot behind the question: “Is Orthodox Judaism true?”

Personally, I believe in God (99% of the time – I think 100% is unhealthy to having an active, thinking religion) and I believe in traditional halacha. But what does believing in traditional halacha mean? That all of Torah Sheba’al peh came directly from God at Har Sinai, or that humans extrapolated it from Torah Shebichtav? There are definitely majorly flawed halachot. If it’s a partially human system, then you can accept that some of it reflects the biases of those who instituted those laws (and you work within the halachic system to change them). If it’s 100% min hashamayim, seems to me that would imply a flawed God. That’s why I think that accepting that the system is partially human created invites MORE emunah, not less.

----------------------

I also entertain skeptical thoughts but here’s the two facts which ground me:

1) I believe in Hashem. How to define Hashem? The standard way – an omnicient and omnipotent entity who created the universe (or, in some way, IS the universe.) I leave out whether this entity exactly matches whet is depicted in Tanach for the moment. Call him a nondenominational God.

2) I believe in Judaism. That is to say, I believe in the process. Rabbinic Judaism is mostly man made anyway. What we practice today would be virtually unrecognizable to Jews at the time of, say, Shlomo HaMelech. So for anyone, 90% of believing in Judaism is believing in the process of Judaism, the give & take of interpretation of the Torah.

As for the other 10% – well, I have doubts, but I figure my belief in Hashem and in the process of Judaism is enough grounding so that I can explore my doubts about whether parts of the Torah were written by humans, or whether individuals in Tanach actually exististed, or if there was ever really a great flood that ecompassed the world, in relative theological comfort.

Click here to learn about how you can sell your products on Amazon and receive $75 in free clicks

Two Cheers


A Guest Post by SM

Obama's speech about the Middle East is an interesting mixture. He was plainly concerned to position America on the side of the masses who have brought about the "Arab Spring". There was a bit of work to do there: America had got behind the curb on Egypt (Kissinger popped up in the British press last week, suggesting that the USA should have maintained its support for Mubarak), gone in heavy on Libya, not been able to match that response when it came to Syria, kept quiet about Bahrain and Saudi Arabia and been dismayed (aren't we all?) that it hasn't really taken in Iran.

All of that means little. Sanctions on regimes the US already dislikes; violence on those that everyone dislikes. Silence on those who the West regard as allies. No one will or can make a move until two things are clear: firstly, whether this really is the masses and secondly what they want to do with the power they have acquired.

Obviously one of the concerns is that the new governments will be less friendly to the US - whose money may be necessary for aid, but no longer required to enable a regime to impose a security operation on a whole country with the one aim of propping itself up. And the US may find that it needs to aid those countries anyway and that the new governments are not quite so biddable on the political front. It seems unlikely - for the immediate future anyway - that these countries are going to be any more friendly to Israel, and they may be less so. The effect of 60 years plus of anti-Semitic education isn't going to go away in the blink of an eye.

But if these countries do move towards democracy what of the rationale for America's support of Israel?

The emphasis on a fair solution, granting the Palestinians what has been granted the Jews, is an obvious answer and is nothing new. The identification of the 1967 borders has been greeted in Europe as a significant shift. It is nothing of the kind and the emphasis on it where I live, simply reflects the media's anti-Israel stance.

The significance seems to me to lie in the express recognition of land swaps as the way forward. That recognises reality on the ground - created by the Israeli policy of settlement - and will not, therefore, please the Palestinians. It also opens the door to discussion of the transfer of parts of Israel proper to a new Palestinian state. Not only will that be anathema to the Israeli right, but it is something that I think we should all regard with concern. It does not assist Israel to be a tolerant and decent society to make sure that its Arab minority is even smaller and that complaints about their treatment can be met with an invitation to move to a different country. Lieberman is a racist and any suggestion endorsing his opinion has something wrong with it.

However, in its willingness to confront the issue - albeit late, unenthusiastically and forced by circumstances - and in its refusal to recognise a unilateral declaration of independence, which would merely be an excuse to avoid negotiating with Israel and dealing with the problems posed by Hamas' rejectionism, the speech is a move in the right direction.



Click here to learn about how you can sell your products on Amazon and receive in free clicks

How the Lag Bomer bonfire is like the Yom Hashoah siren


Those of you who oppose Yom Hazikoron observances like the siren, on the grounds that this is not a Jewish practice are required to oppose the practice of lighting bonfires on Lag B'omer.

Bonfires were known in Christian Europe as a way to honor Chirstian saints as far back as the tenth century. They don't appear as a Jewish practice until the 16th century.

Christian scholars say that this practice of celebrating saints with bonfires is traced to pagan, pre-Christian practices, which were later adapted by the local people to Christianity. Indeed, the Celtics made bonfires to honor some of their deities and spirits. No one would ever claim that these Celtic practices, going back into old England, were originally of Jewish origin.

The Lag B'omer bonfire is every bit as foreign as the siren. If one is out, so is the other.

Song about the Fogel family


A guest post by Philo

I know many will find this moving. And of course, the tragedy is uncomprehendible horror. I keep thinking of that little girl, coming home and finding her family murdered.

But this video seems clichéd and exploitative to me. It's pulling out all the stops and yet succeeds only in making the victims into generic Jews, saying nothing about the real people they were.

What do you think?



Click here to learn about how you can sell your products on Amazon and receive $75 in free clicks

The Bible Revisited


A Guest Post by @Azigra

Many are familiar with the the ancient Jewish sects the Pharisees and the Sadducees. Long forgotten, however, is another ancient group known as the Haraidesees. Why history choose to forget them is a debate amongst scholars. While their memory may have been lost their scrolls and artifacts have survived.

Recently, Dr. @azigra, a foremost expert in Hebrew manuscripts happened upon a clay pot under the ruins of a first century synagogue in modern day Lebanon. Inside was a scroll containing the Bible text used by the Haraidesses. The differences are subtle, but it answers the long held question about the Jewishness of the Bible.

What I Learned From the Cairo Geniza



A Guest Post By E. Fink

Original posted on my home blog.

Recently I found an interest in the Cairo Geniza. I went on Amazon and looked for the best looking book I could find on the Cairo Geniza and I bought Sacred Trash: The Lost and Found World of the Cairo Geniza. It was amazing.

First, some background. There is a prohibition against the detsruction of God's printed name. So what do you do when the names are printed in books or on papers if they are no longer able to be used? Geniza. They are buried and given the same respect given to humans after humans die.

Generally, a geniza will be buried and the paper will decompose and be lost forever. The Cairo Geniza is a collection of items that fell into disuse. But the Cairo Geniza has two incredible anomolies that make it so special.

Yeshuahs For Sale (act fast)


This website (provided by LKA) promises all sorts of outstanding benefits to anyone who sends $100 to the organization which runs the comfort tents at Meron. The website is FULL of John Edwards style testimonials from People Who Had Their Lives Changed as soon as they ponied up the 100 clams.

In fact, it seems clear from the website that the only reason why anyone is poor, sick or childless is b/ they are too lazy to get their rear ends to Meron. (I am pretty mad at my teachers, by the way. They told me a needed to learn, and do mitzvos, and be nice to others. What a load of baloney. Why should I bother being nice, when I can just send $100 to Meron and Have It All?)

PS: I promise YESHUAHS in the name to anyone who puts a LAG B'OMER message on my BlogAds. GUARANTEED! (if it doesn't work, tsk, that's just proof you didn't believe, you KOFER!)



Mitzvoth not magic: Or what about R. Yehuda?


From June 3, 2006

Sometimes, I wonder if Rabbi Yehuda HaNasi might be jealous. He was the chief editor of the Mishna, the first great code of Jewish law, a code studied to this day by school children and scholars alike, while also serving as a key leader of the Jewish community during Roman times. Yet the glory -if glory is measured in songs and stories- goes to Rabbi Shimon Bar Yochai, the man who may have written the Zohar*, and is remembered, to this day, on his feast day, with bonfires and other tributes, including a pair of very long prayer poems which suggest, among other praises, that Bar Yochai was holy from the moment of his conception.

I want to win some of that glory for Yehuda HaNasi. I want celebrations in his honor, celebrations of scholarship, and for the talent for organization that made the Mishna possible.

Too much is made of mysticism. Too many Jews seek redemption by dunking in Mikvahs and running to graves and miracle workers, by mumbling Pslams, or performing segulahs. A feast day for Yehuda Hanasi, one with all the accoutrements (save, of course, the hagiographies, and the extolments borrowed from Christianity that make up the Lag Bomer liturgy) might trim the boat, and redirect some of Jewish energy and attention toward the neglected idea that a Jew is redeemed through mitvoth -not through magic, mysticism, or miracles.

*He didn't

What message is Hashem trying to send by making people run stop signs and drive erratically?


Unfortunately there have been a few terrible car accidents recently in the frum community. Why do you think this is happening?

A. Tznius!!


B. Women wearing Shabbos robes


C. Bochurim in Japan (I know, not our fault, but doesn't everything somehow come back to this?)


D. Bloggers


E. Working guys


D. Lipa


E. Long wigs


F. Internet (without ishur)


G. Women (not sure what, but it's always their fault)


H. Modern Orthodoxy


I. Chalav Stam


J. Natan Slifkin


K. Liberals


Did I leave anything out?


(Postscript - As I was about to post this I heard about a campaign being launched as a zechut for a few recent crash victims. This is the second time that this is being done; the first time, it was in the zechut of a young mother in a coma who "WITHIN A SHORT TIME OF THE POSTER AWARENESS CAMPAIGN, MIRACULOUSLY HAD A COMPLETE RECOVERY." The campaign involves posters warning against the dangers of texting and being busy with your phone... so far so good... are they actually going to acknowledge that doing this while driving causes accidents? Think of how many lives can be saved by this campaign. What a zechut! I was about to delete this entire post... but then I finished reading... "... during Davening.." And so ladies and gentlemen, I give you option L.)

Lag BaOmer: One Big Mistake?


From May 15, 2006

Jameel has translated an article which suggests our lag bomer celebrations came into existance because of a scribal error. Interesting -and plausible- theory.

However, Jameel sullies the effort by restating this defeated notion: I think that the medurot idea could have come from the method of notifying the Jewish people in Galut of the arrival of the new Jewish Month

Though it is true, that Jews of ancient Jerusalem lit bonfires to alert neighboring towns that a new month had been declared, there is no connection between this ritual and the bonfires of Lag B'omer. The new moon bonfire was discontinued more than 2000 years ago, and almost 1500 years passed before the Lag B'omer bonfires made their first appearence, in Safed (they weren't known in Jewish Europe for another hundred years at least.) Correction: The bonfires first appeared in Jewish Europe in the 17th century. They were long used in Christian Europe to celebrate saints, and for other religious purposes. Our Lag B'omer bonifres are derived from that.




Oh, those silly and wily Jews (1850)


A guest post by Philo

Here's an article from Harper's Magazine in 1850 (apparently reprinted from the Dublin University Magazine,) with the kind of socially acceptable anti-Semitism that was prevalent at the time.

-----------------------------------------------------


Harper’s Magazine June 1850, pages 119 – 120

[From the Dublin University Magazine]

JEWISH VENERATION

THE veneration of the Jew for the law is displayed by the grossest superstition, a copy of the Torah or Decalogue being carefully soldered into a narrow tin case, and hung over the entrance to their chambers, as old crones with us nail a horse-shoe to a door; it is even believed to avail as an amulet or charm capable of averting evil, or curing the most obstinate disease. "Ah," said a bed-ridden old Hebrew woman to me, as I visited the mission hospital in Jerusalem, "what can the doctors do for me? If I could only touch the Torah I should be made whole." Not exactly comprehending what she meant, I handed her a little tin-cased copy of the Ten Commandments; she grasped it in her emaciated hands, which trembled with anxiety, and her eyes were lit up with a transient gleam of joy. "Are you made whole?" I inquired; she made no answer, fell back on her pillow, let drop the Torah, and turned from me with a sigh.

Sitting one evening with an intelligent German Jew, who used often to pay me a visit at my lodgings, the conversation turned on Jewish religious rites and ceremonies. Alluding to the day of atonement, he assured me that on that day the Jews believe that ministers are appointed in heaven for the ensuing year: a minister over angels; one over the stars; one over earth; the winds, trees, plants, birds, beasts, fishes, men, and so forth.

That, on that day also, the good and evil deeds of every son of Abraham are actually summed up, and the balance struck for or against each, individually. Where the evil deeds preponderate, such individuals are brought in as in debt to the law; and ten days after the day of atonement, summonses are issued to call the defaulters before God. When these are served, the party summoned to appear is visited either with sudden death or a rapid and violent disease which must terminate speedily in death. "But can not the divine wrath be appeased?" said I. "Not appeased," said my informant; "the decree must be evaded." "How so?" "Thus," he replied. "When a Jew is struck with sudden sickness about this time, if he apprehends that his call is come, he sends immediately for twelve eiders of his people; they demand his name; be tells them, for example, my name is Isaac; they answer, thy name shall no more be Isaac, but Jacob shall thy name be called. Then kneeling round the sick man, they pray for him in these words: O God, thy servant, Isaac, has not good deeds to exceed the evil, and a summons against him has gone forth; but this pious man before thee, is named Jacob, and not Isaac. There is a flaw in the indictment; the name in the angel's summons is not correct, therefore, thy servant Jacob can not be called on to appear." "After all," said I, "suppose this Jacob dies." 'Then," replied my companion, "the almighty is unjust; the summons was irregular, and its execution not according to law."

Does not this appear incredible? Another anecdote, and I have done.

On the same occasion we were speaking about vows, and the obligation of fulfilling them. "As to paying your vow," said my Jewish friend, "we consider it performed, if the vow be observed to the letter." He then gave me the following rather ludicrous illustration as a case in point: There was in his native village a wealthy Jew, who was seized with a dangerous illness. Seeing death approach, despite of his physician's skill, he bethought him of vowing a vow; so he solemnly promised, that if God would restore him to health, he, on his part, on his recovery, would sell a certain fat beast in his stall, and devote the proceeds to the Lord.

The man recovered, and in due time appeared before the door of the synagogue, driving before him a goodly ox, and carrying under one arm a large, black Spanish cock. The people were coming out of the synagogue, and several Jewish butchers, after artistically examining the fine, fat beast, asked our convalescent what might be the price of the ox. "This ox," replied the owner, "I value at two shillings" (I substitute English money); but the cock," he added, ostentatiously exhibiting chanticleer, “I estimate at twenty pounds." The butchers laughed at him; they thought he was in joke. However, as he gravely persisted that he was in earnest, one of them, taking him at his word, put down two shillings for the ox. "Softly, my good friend," rejoined the seller, "I have made a vow not to sell the ox without the cock; you must buy both, or be content with neither." Great was the surprise of the bystanders, who could not conceive what perversity possessed their, wealthy neighbor. But the cock being value for two shillings, and the ox for twenty pounds, the bargain was concluded, and the money paid.

Our worthy Jew now walks up to the Rabbi, cash in hand. "This," said he, handing the two shillings, "I devote to the service of the synagogue, being the price of the ox, which I had vowed; and this, placing the twenty pounds in his own bosom, is lawfully mine own, for is it not the price of the cock?" "And what did your neighbors say of the transaction? Did they not think this rich man an arrant rogue?" "Rogue!" said my friend, repeating my last words with some amazement, "they considered him a pious and a clever man." Sharp enough, thought I; but delicate about exposing my ignorance, I judiciously held my peace.


Click here to learn about how you can sell your products on Amazon and receive $75 in free clicks

Why aren't the bonfires being canceled or rescheduled?


In Israel, some of the major Lag Bomer bonfires attract 10s of thousands of people, requiring cooperation from local police and fire authorities. This year Lag Bomer falls on Saturday night, meaning the local police and fire authorities will be required to work for the sake of the bonfires.

Some Rabbis have called for the bonfires to be canceled or rescheduled to prevent the shabbos desecration, and small concessions have been made by some groups. In Meron, for example, the most popular bonfire won't be lit until after midnight, but is that enough?

I don't understand why they haven't been canceled all together.

The bonfires are not required by Torah or rabinic law, and according to some don't even count as an official minhag. They're just something that some Jews do. And even if they did have some religious status, the precedent is still clear: We cancel shofer blowing on Rosh Hashana, a Torah mitzvah, when Rosh Hashana falls on shabbos. What possible logic can be behind the decision not to cancel the bonfires? They will unquestionably cause shabbos desecration, so how can they be allowed?

Is this another example of certain religious groups putting their own personal priorities and desires ahead of the community of Israel as a whole? Why is one person's desire to dance by the light of a bonfire, more valuable then another Jew's shabbos observance?

Back to normal?


Blogger seems like it might be back to normal, but posts from after Wednesday are still missing. Hope they get restored, as promised.

Good shabbos


Click here to learn about how you can sell your products on Amazon and receive $75 in free clicks

Is God a Socialist? Notes on the Jubilee


This is the personification of
Israel from the Comic Torah.
In the seventh year we must
cease from plowing her.
This week's sedra is a stark reminder that living in a "Torah/Bible-based society" will require more than the elimination of homosexuals.God may not like gays but, based on several verses in Behar, it seems clear that He also dislikes property ownership. As per the 25th chapter of Leviticus, your rights as a land owner are severely limited. Not only are you required to sacrifice a year of productivity at the end of every shmita cycle, you're also forbidden to sell your farmland for good. Until the Rabbis worked out a loophole, you were only permitted to lease your land until the next jubilee. Then, it was returned to you.

This isn't capitalism, and its not something the typical right winger supports, or likely even knows exists. Its also hard to see how the rules in Lev 25 might work in modern society. The jubilee provisions make it almost impossible to develop land. They suppress entrepreneurship, and prevent the accumulation of large estates and fortunes. That might be okay for an agrarian society with a population kept stable by wars, infections, and disease, but how can you accommodate population growth if the farmland you'd like to turn into apartments is always due to be returned to someone? Didn't the divine author anticipate penicillin and vaccines?

The Rabbis solved the problem by creating* the loophole of a perpetual lease. Though the word of the Torah is usually considered the highest trump card, the Rabbis decided that here, at least, a contract between two people was of greater value. As a result, you can get around the requirement to return farmland to the original owner by signing a 999 year lease. Samson Rephael Hirsch claims that such a lease was only permitted after the fact, or bidieved, but I think the sources are clear that they were signed l'chatchila. Nowadays, none of this is relevant because we've forgotten the count. Because no one knows exactly when a Jubilee year falls, we collectively shrug our shoulders and say, "Oh, well."

I think that along with that shrug, there's also a sigh of relief. People understand that keeping Jubilee would be a disaster for economic progress. So rather than finding a way to rehabilitate it (as in the case of several other commandments) we've found a way to let it slide.

*Don't complain to me about the verb. Per the Rambam, there are five categories of Mesorah. Two of them are definitely from Sinai, the other three are not. The jubilee loophole is a takanah, or something imposed by the Rabbis to address issues that emerged as the world changed. In this case, they saw the problem keeping Jubilee imposed, so they developed a work-around. 

Will the 9/11 First Responders Law Do the Job?



Will the 9/11 First Responders Law Do the Job?
A guest post by Barbara O'Brien

In the final days of the 111th Congress, the James Zadroga 9/11 Health And Compensation Act, also called the "9/11 First Responders bill," finally passed. The Act will provide medical monitoring and care for those who worked on the smoldering ruins of the World Trade Center after the 9/11 attacks, as well as for many who lived and worked nearby.

However, at the insistence of some senators, the final bill was considerably watered down from what it had been originally. More than $3 billion in funding was cut from s previous version of the bill, for example. Will the revised bill still do the job?

[More after the jump]

Review: The Comic Torah


Is it mockery or midrash? This is the question I kept asking myself as a I read The Comic Torah: Reimagining the Very Good Book, an ambituous attempt by Aaron Freeman (Author) and Sharon Rosenzweig (Illustrator) to retell the Pentateuch as a graphic novel.

Read about it after the jump

Why do we like Rashby better than Isaiah?


According to the Torah-true power rankings, a navi (that is a prophet) outranks a tanna (that is a Sage quoted in the Mishna). The prophet is believed to have more knowledge, more power, and more access to siyata dismaya or heavenly assistance. The Rabbis of the Talmud themselves agreed with this evaluation saying "If the earlier generations were like angels, we are like humans. But if they were like humans, we are like donkeys."

So what explains the fact that the grave of the Tanna Rabbi Shimon bar Yochai is one of the top pilgrimage destinations in all of Judaism, while the graves of prophets like Isaiah are seldom visited? Why do those Jews who believe in the power of visiting graves imagine that the benefit available to them at the grave of a Tanna is superior to the benefit available at the grave of a prophet?

I expect some of you will suggest that Rabbi Shimon Bar Yochai's grave is more popular because he wrote the Zohar*, generally considered by Jews who have not read it to be the most awesome book ever. I don't think that's the true explanation;  if it is, what a sad statement about contemporary Orthodox Judaism. See, Isaiah also wrote a book**. The one that bears his name. Is that chopped liver? If this love of the Zohar is the real reason for the popularity of Rashby's grave - and I'm not convinced - this is further proof that in contemporary Orthodox Judaism magic trumps ethics. After all, the Zohar speaks of cool-sounding mystical mysteries, while all the Book of Isaiah seems to care about is being nice to widows and orphans, and the various promises God made to the Jewish people. (Plus it has a lot of poetry, and poetry is krum.)

* Rabbi Shimon bar Yochai did not, in fact, write the Zohar, but I don't want to get into that here. 
** Isaiah did not, in fact, write large sections of the book that bears his name, but I don't want to get into that here. 

Click here to learn about how you can sell your products on Amazon and receive $75 in free clicks

Regarding the Agudath Israel Statement Regarding "Magen Tzedek"


A Guest Post By E. Fink

(Cross-posted from my home blog: Agudath Israel Misses the Boat on Magen Tzedek)

A few of the "news for Jews" blogs posted a statement from Agudath Israel regarding Magen Tzedek.

See: Agudath Israel statement on “Magen Tzedek”. Of course Agudath Israel can't post it on their own website because they don't have one since the Internet is prohibited. Nonetheless they managed to leak the statement to the sinners who have blogs and news sites so that pretty much every single orthodox Jew will see the statement on the Internet. Ahhhh, the games we play...

Anyway, the statement makes a gross misrepresentation of Magen Tzedek, misunderstands its purpose, injects non-existent agendas into an otherwise somewhat worthy cause and as per usual, weakens the clout with which orthodox Jewish leaders have in the lives of orthodox Jews.

Who is Osama bin Ladin?



Via Ezra

Moan about the younger generation all you like. Before Twitter and the Internet, they never would have asked and never would have found out.


I agree with Napolitano on this




The loud Republican man is 100 percent correct, only he's a bit of a hypocrite for failing to notice that George W. Bush was also guilty of ignoring the law when it suited him. When he, and his fellow Republican Bush-worshipers were praising W's every bowel movement, I was warning that future president's would avail themselves of the unlawful W. precedents... and so it has come to pass.


Some Whiny, Petulant, Loserish, Conservative Reactions


“I’d rather have Bin Laden hiding for many more years than have Obama get the credit…and guaranteed re-election. How could Bush fail for 8 years and Obama gets him in just a few? Ugh.
Now at the Phillies/Mets game, the fans are chanting USA and OBAMA. This is the worst possible news.
--- from a commenter at The Corner. Speaks for itself.


Breaking -= FOX News is reporting that Muslim leader Osama Bin Laden is dead and that the US has his body. Obama to address the nation, I hope he doesn't get choked up  --
--- From Atlas Shrugged who astonishingly almost made it through a whole sentence before bashing Obama. Don't expect that to be a trend though.


UPDATE: Crowds of cheering Americans gathered outside the White House in Washington DC, chanting "USA, USA." Not a burka in the crowd.
--- Also from Atlas Shrugged who failed to note there wasn't a Yankee hat in the crowd either. Why do Yankee fans support bin Ladin? 


“We Thank President Bush For Having Made The Right Calls To Set Up This Victory.”
-- Sarah Palin, who seems to have forgotten that Bush gave up on bin Ladin in 2003. Also, Bush was not in the room when the call was made "to set up this victory"


Let’s be honest folks: if any one person, in addition to our military personnel, deserves to be singled out for adoration at this time it’s George W. Bush
-- A Breitbart blog writer, Guy doesn't even try to hide his man crush. Talk about messiah worshipers.


I have a real problem with the way this thing has been handled." He later added: "My problem with this is is that we gave this guy a dignified burial at sea. Or at least that's what they said. I really would have put [bin Laden] in a meat grinder with a pig, honestly
-- Glen Beck, who seems to think Obama deserves critiscm for not allowing us to dance on bin Ladin's corpse.


"If Obama Were A Shoo-In For Re-Election "Osama Bin Laden Would Still Be Alive Today"
-- Rush Limbaugh. Right. And FDR went to war with Hitler for the sakeof poll numbers, too.



Remember folks. Supposedly its the DEMOCRATS who are trying to politicize this! What a bunch of losers.

Click here to learn about how you can sell your products on Amazon and receive $75 in free clicks