Showing posts with label sforno. Show all posts
Showing posts with label sforno. Show all posts

Thursday, December 01, 2011

What might Sforno think of us?

In RWOJ, its common for parents to support their married children for several years. Following the practices of the shtetel, most young men marry at a young age, before they are in any position to provide for their wives and family. Many of these men enter into marriage relying on their parents, and on God, with no plans or ambitions, other than to have sex as soon as possible, and to remain unemployed for as long as possible.  This is considered meritorious, a proof of faith, and men with no money are often married off with the full blessings of their families and their communities.

Sforno, I imagine, would be appalled. When the verse tells us that Jacob offered to work seven years for Rachel's hand, he says:

אֵין סָפֵק שֶׁלּא הָיָה הַצַּדִּיק נושֵׂא אִשָּׁה וּמַעֲמִיד בָּנִים אִם לא הָיָה בְּיָדו לְפַרְנְסָם

Translation: This righteous man would never have married a woman, and started having children unless he had a way to provide for them.

Sforno goes on to explain that Jacob, in fact, was not destitute as is commonly assumed.

What would Sfrono say about us? Would he judge anyone who marries a woman without a plan to support her as lacking in righteousness? 



HT @efink

Wednesday, November 23, 2011

Sforno and the mythical schoolhouse of Shem and Ever

What were the "tents" in which Jacob sat?

The traditional interpretation These were the tents of Shem and Ever who ran some kind of proto-yeshiva where Jacob studied. Each founder had his own tent, thus "Jacob sat in tentS" (Beraishis Raba, popularized by Rashi)

Sforno's interpretation Jacob had two different tents. One was his shepherd tent, where he lived while he was with the flocks; the other was a meditation tent where he studied and prayed.

The merit of Sforno's interpretation At first, I preferred this reading because it does not rely on new information. Instead of introducing somthing foreign to the story, and pre-supposing an ancient yeshiva, it responds to the words on the page. The word tents is plural, and Sforno tells us why without getting too creative (or falling back on the creativity of the Sages). However, I must point out that Sforno does mention the mythical Yeshiva later in his commentary. He seems to have believed it existed, and he he seems to have believed Jacob studied there. Unlike Rashi and the Sages, however, he does not agree that the multiple tents of our verse are a reference to that institution.

More Sforno later.

Search for more information about # at 4torah.com
Shop Wireless - All Verizon Phones Starting at a Penny

Shop Amazon's Toys - Black Friday and Cyber Monday Deals Week

Friday, November 18, 2011

Sforno v. the mainstream view (Chayyei Sarah)

What's this? Some kind of new DovBear feature? Why yes. Read about it here

Why did Lavan run to greet Abraham's servant?


  • The traditional interpretation: Because Lavan was a greedy SOB, who saw the jewels Rivka received, and wanted to get his hands on more of same (Rashi via Gen Rabbah)
  • Sforno says: Lavan appreciated the gift his sister's received, and out of a sense of gratitude wanted to extend hospitality to the man.
  • The merits of Sforno's reading: Protects Lavan's reputation; demonstrates a willingness to judge people favorable.

Read my famous Chayyei Sarah ParshaNotes here

Monday, November 07, 2011

Some Sforno on Vayerah (or places where he disagrees with our first grade teachers)


Long time readers know I enjoy finding and sharing non-traditional bible readings, and  I especially like it when the non-traditional reading is produced by a classic commentator. Recently, I've begun re-acquainting myself with Ovadia Sforno's commentary on the Pentateuch. The Sforno (as he is known) has a reputation for such non-traditional* readings, and so far I've discovered an overabundance of examples.

I intend to share some of them with you each week. The first batch is after the jump.

[* Yes, I recognize the irony of calling his interpretations "non-traditional." I hope you do, too.]