Support the Pathetic Annual Telethon

I give up. The previous links didn't work. Please use this button instead.

Oy, gevalt… the holy yud and hey


A guest post by Jennifer in MamaLand

Am I the only one feeling a little “gevalt-ish” about this??? I’m all for not taking Hashem’s name in vain (OMG, who wouldn’t be? – ha ha ha), but is this a bit – much?

This worksheet for Parshas Vayeishev, downloadable at chinuch.org, asks (both questions are the same), “Who else was in jail?” (ie with Yosef).

But the word “was” (in Hebrew, היה) happens to contain letters that are also present in Hashem’s name, ie the letter Yud and the letter Hey.

So it’s been hyphenated. הי-ה… lest anybody think that we are actually using Hashem’s name.

This makes about as much sense as hyphenating the word “pagoda.” (I can just hear someone saying, “Well, it does have ‘God’ in the middle…”)

>> Read the rest of J's rant after the jump

Vayeshev Parsha Notes


I should have posted this last week. Apologies.

Allusions
The story of Tamar's rape in the Book of Samuel is the Joseph story told backwards. It begins with Amonon clearing the room using the same exact words Joseph used before he revealed himself to his brother. When Amnom attacks Tamar, he says "Lie with me" which recalls the language Potiphar's wife employed. Following the crime Tamar tears her ketonet pasim; likewise Joseph - the only other character in the bible to have a ketonet pasim - has his coat torn.

The first Tamar story (Judah's daughter in law) overflows with allusions to the rest of Genesis

 >> Read the rest of my parsha notes 

Krum speaks! A defense of "Yeshiva guy says over a vort" by its creator


Guest post by “Krum As A Bagel”

Note:
 This post was taken from Hirhurim, where it was posted as an invited response to a really bad post which attempted to criticize the video but missed the boat by about ten miles as I discuss here. 

Gil has generously offered me the opportunity to post a response to his post (link). Much of what I say below reiterates comments I made to Gil’s post and echoes what others have written, but, as the producer of the “yeshiva guy” video, I thought it worthwhile to post a response in a public forum. I find the need to do this somewhat irritating, as I believe the video speaks for itself and I really don’t have the time or energy to engage in a lengthy debate about it (which is why I abandoned my blog years ago), but given the attention it has received and the accusations made about it and its producer, I feel obliged to respond.

>> Read the rest after the jump

More misbehaving in Bnai Brak Ir HaKodesh


Ethiopian Teen Attacked at Mikveh
Racism in Bnei Brak: Worker curses boy at entrance to ritual bath, calling him 'stinking black person,' then follows him home and physically attacks his family. 'I slapped him but good,' he tells police >>More

Said the great Yitz Jordan on Facebook:
Not only should this worker be fired immediately AND arrested, but is there going to be ANYONE who stands up for Ethiopians and other Jews of color in situations like this? If I heard "stinking kushi" being said while I was in the mikvah!? This can NOT be allowed to go on. When a woman wears a t-shirt, B'nei B'rak riots, will there be riots for this?!

My reply: 
Of course there won't be riots. The rioters riot because they hate women, not because they love Torah. They're not likely to riot in this case because they hate black people, too.


Search for more information about Bnai Brak bastards at 4torah.com.

This is the life we're living




Hysterical, in parts, but it was not necessary to make the pink bear a bal teshuvah or to make him quite that bitter; plus in the last two minutes it goes from satire to horror show.

[Note: Don't fall into the trap of assuming the creator is a bitter bal teshuvah. Not all art is autobiographical.]


Search for more information about con jobs at 4torah.com.

Great Moments in Marketing


Tweeters, bloggers and others are mocking Whiskey Tango, a bar in Miami, for offering to pay the house's tab whenever the Heat lost. A sample:
@yglesias:  Bwahaha. Miami bar that promised free drinks for every Heat loss down $30,000. http://bit.ly/fZCDAw
It would appear the joke is on the bar, with the Heat having lost 8 games already. According to the owners,they are down about $30,000 in revenue, but only about $10,000 net. (Bars mark up drinks as much as 30 percent) 

And what has the bar gotten for $10,000? Over 60 radio interviews, mentions on ESPN, CNN, DovBear, and other networks, and plenty of play from tweeters, bloggers and others who think Whiskey Tango made a mistake.

Not bad for $10,000.


Search for more information about money well spent at 4torah.com.

Christian Republicans using anti-Semitic appeals to target a Jewish Republican


In Texas, race-baiting Republican Christians are using anti-Semitic appeals in their campaign to defeat a fellow Republican, Joe Straus.

Apparently, even Republicans aren't safe from the racism and nastiness of the right wing. As C>A notes in the first comment, poor Eric Cantor!

What follows after the jump are some of the offensive materials, all of which were collected by Think Progress.

>> Read the rest

PUPPETRY: Beck vs Soros


PUPPETRY 
by Hendrik Hertzberg
NOVEMBER 29, 2010

It’s hardly news when Fox News airs something nasty. This time, though, it’s personal—or, at least, institutional. Recently, the nation’s highest-rated cable-news network’s biggest star devoted three hour-long episodes of his program to an attack on a single prominent citizen. The in-house advance publicity for these broadcasts was lavish. A promotional spot, distilling to thirty seconds the moral essence of the programs it advertised, is worth describing in full.


>>Read more

Avos and Mitzvos: Fisking the Hirhurim post*



There's a very long post up at Hirhurim which manages to misrepresent the Krum video and the response to it. It's really quite a bad job.


 * I don't name the author because I don't want this post to come up when people Google his name

A great comment on Rabbi Yair's Awful Response


Written by 'Jon". Found on R. Harry's Emes v'Emunah

a) The majority of noteworthy Rishonim hold against Rashi - on the minimalist side you have Rambam, Ramban, Ritva, Meiri, Tosafot, Hizkuni, Ibn Ezra, Rashbam, Radak, Seforno, Beit Yosef, Ramah. On the maximalist side you have Rashi, Maharsha (the exception that proves the rule of course) and Aharonim. It's not just that the minimalist position is more rational and compelling - it's also that among the Rishonim, the maximalist view was da'as yachid!

b) R. Hoffman simply makes things up. The video NEVER mocks the Avot, the Mitzvot, or R. Elyashiv, or even the maximalist view itself! It merely quotes R. Elyashiv, and mocks the way the yeshiva guy invokes him to end the discussion. It merely discusses something to do with the Avot and the mitzvot, and the maximalist view, and mocks a certain caricature of the *people* who maintain that view. Does that mean that it, implicitly, mocks Rashi? No - Rashi was never a yeshiva guy saying over a vort! In other words, I'm sure the assumption on the part of the maker of the video - even if he isn't frum - is that Rashi was a serious scholar who would have given serious answers to the questions, and even if they didn't make the view any more digestable, I'm sure the maker of the video, and the video itself, is maintaining a distinction between Rashi and "yeshiva guys."

c) What the hell does "if you're doing kiruv talk about the minimalist position" even mean??? What, tell the BT about the minimalist position so he thinks Talmidei Hakhamim are smart, then once we sucker him in, pull out the rug from under him with the information that his hashkafos are treif??? I know this isn't just from R. Hoffman but from a lot of kiruv people, but it's quite silly - and dangerous. The yeshivish community needs to start applying their tremendous abilities of critical and analytic thought to things besides mahlokos Rishonim in Bava Metzia immediately, or they're going to have a second Haskala on their - and our - hands.

4) the reason the view became so prevalent is easily explainable: Rashi is the only perush on Humash studied! The yeshivish yeshivot REALLY need to start reading perushim besides Rashi immediately, and stop imagining that anything he says has any more significance than the words of the Ramban, Ibn Ezra, Radak, Rashbam, Seforno, etc. If your only intake of Tanakh is Shnayim Mikra and the only perush you look at is Rashi, then you will have a severely limited view of the truth of Humash, any knowledge of Nakh, and vital hashkafic information - of course, if the only "hashkafic" works allowed into yeshivot are actually intellectual mussar works like Mesilat Yesharim, Derekh Hashem, Hovot Levavot, Mikhtav Me'Eliyahu and such - or has anyone met a yeshiva guy learning the Moreh Nevukhim or Abarbanel? - then you aren't going to get much information to begin with. Shas and Tosafot are important - indeed I think they're the most important - but even without spending more time on Humash and hashkafa, the yeshivish yeshivot need to expand their horizons.

Search for more information about [topic] at 4torah.com.

Additional issues with the famous Gemarah about Patriarchs and their  Eruv Tavshilin


The aggada cited on Yoma 28B says Avraham kept all mitzvos and evem made an Eruv Tavshilin, however it does not agree with the midrash recorded in Bereishis Rabah 64:6. Yoma says Avraham kept eruv tavshilin; the midrash says eruv chatzaros.

Meanwhile the Vilna Gaon (Kol Eliyahu #26) says our gemrah is wrong, and that actually it was Eruv Techumin. Additionally, the Malbim says "Eruv Tavshilim" means the patriarchs kept their milk and meat separate, and not that they performed the rabbinic ritual that allowed them to prepare for shabbos on Yom Tov.

So, are we starting to see why its an act of violence against both Rashi and the tradition to teach simply that "Rashi says Yaakov kept all 613 mitzvos including Eruv Tavshilim"

Yet this bowdlerized travesty of Rashi's position is precisely what's taught, and in some circles you're a kofer for disagreeing, and even for saying that as a non-kohen keeping "all mitzos" was impossible for Yaakov ("Impossible? How can you say anything was impossible for Yaakov?")

It is this reprehensible state of affairs, this sad way of thinking, that Rabbi Yair Hoffman seems to want continued in the name of "tradition".

Search for more information about [topic] at 4torah.com.

A video response to the response to the video


This isn't funny, and the ending sucks, but it says some things that need to be said.



Search for more information about nasty videos like this one at 4torah.com.

Evil Jew hating New York Times strikes again!



How dare the New York Times glorify the cuisine of the shtetl with a prominent article in their food section. This is clearly part of a left wing liberal secular humanist plot to undermine cholent!


Recently, American Jews have been pouring their energy into old Ashkenazic dishes that had traveled so far they had lost much of their flavor...

Hat Tip Chometz Ben Yayin

A Note From a Victim of Abuse


A Guest Post By E. Fink

This post is copied entirely from my home blog at finkorswim.com.

A couple days ago, I wrote a review of a book called Hush. (See Book Review | Hush)

I received this anonymous "stream of consciousness" email asking me to post her thoughts on the book and on the abuse situation in general. I have done just a tiny bit of editing but the emailer really wished that the note be presented in this raw form. I apologize for its length, but I encourage you to read it carefully and think about its message.

Just to give you a bit of background on who I am. I did not grow up in the Chasidic world but in the orthodox yeshiva world. I went to the community yeshiva for elementary school and then to Bais Yaakov high school and seminary in Israel (and a good one that’s hard to get into.) My brother was and is part of the Yeshiva world as well as the rest of my siblings. My family is a core part of the community and is well respected and liked by everyone. We were not a family with “issues” my family is wonderful and “normal” – or so it seems.

I’m not sure we to begin. I just finished reading the book Hush. I can’t stop crying the tears will not stop coming. Of course the book was moving and well written but most importantly, I think I am crying because I was Devory. I was the little girl who was molested by her brother.

The Avos and the Mitzvos: A response to R. Yair Hoffman


I see one of the Five Towns clergy has attempted a response to Krum's outstanding video about the patriarchs and their mitzvah observance. Sadly, the response, written by Yair Hoffman for the 5 Towns Jewish Times, completely misses the point.

Here's his thesis [all errors of grammar, style and usage are SIC]:
An analysis of the video reveals that the agenda of the Youtube video producer was to push some of the left-of-center Hashkafa and to undermine the lessons taught in more Yeshivesh circles. It also mocks one of the Gedolei HaDor- Rav Elyashiv Shlita – and does so in a very unbecoming manner.
The problem here is that what Rabbi Hoffman dismisses as a "left-of-center" hashkofa was originally propagated by the Rishonim. If you open your mikraot gedolot to Gen 26:5 you will find that with the exception of Rashi every Rishon on the page - including Ramban, Rashbam, Ibn Ezra, Chizkuni, and Radak - disagrees with the premise that the Patriarchs kept all of the commandments.

So according to Rabbi Hoffman, are Ramban, Rashbam, Ibn Ezra, Chizkuni, and Radak to be considered iffy left-wingers?

This isn't a small question. In his rush to defend his own cherished way of thinking, Rabbi Hoffman has tossed five Rishonim, and all who accept them, under the proverbial bus. Like the brown bear who asked if the Rishonim expounding the view he didn't know "went to YU", Rabbi Hoffman seems convinced that anyone who hold like a Rishon, and not with his own friends is to be suspected. In keeping with this skewed sense of loyalty to his own kind at the expense of the classical commentators, Rabbi Hoffman angrily defends Rav Elyashiv, even as he is helping to marginalize 5 Rishonim.

But the larger issue is that in his mad rush to condemn anyone who thinks like the Rishonim, and not like the members of his own 21st century "yeshivish circle" Rabbi Hoffman has managed to completely misunderstand the video. Despite what Rabbi Hoffman says, its target isn't Rashi, who seems to think that the Patriarchs kept mitzvos, nor did it poke fun of Chazal. In fact, the video's wit is squarely aimed at the poorly educated fools who think they are doing God and Judaism a favor by strenuously defending the most fantastical interpretations while simultaneously ignoring and/or disparaging the Rishonim who disagreed with them. This is approximately what the peach-colored bear actually says at the end of the video. Had Rabbi Hoffman not been blinded by his own agenda, he might have noticed this.

Notwithstanding his inability to correctly perceive the object of the video's mockery,  Rabbi Hoffman might be  right about a related point. He writes that the video seeks to undermine "the lessons taught in more Yeshivesh circles" and this is true;  however, I would add that those lessons deserve to be undermined if they are disrespectful to Ramban, Rashbam, Ibn Ezra, Chizkuni, and Radak. Like Krum, I know dozens of yeshivish Jews who will answer with utter rudeness, anger, and indignation when you "say over" an interpretation that disagrees with Rashi, or with the popular midrashim. This is the attitude Krum mocks. Krum and his video have no beef with Chazal; their opponents are the yeshivish simpletons who are unable to comprehend that much of what they take for granted was not accepted by Rishonim.

Even the comment about Rav Elyahiv had absolutely nothing to do with the sage himself, but with fools who who cling too tenaciously to a literal understanding of Rashi and midrashim. In the video, Rabbi Elyashiv isn't being attacked for ruling against wearing Crocs on Yom Kippur; rather, the brown bear (and those who think like he does) was being mocked for imagining that Yaakov's observances took into consideration halachic rulings made 4000 years later.

At the close of the article Rabbi Hoffman's contempt for the Rishonim is on full display when he concedes that while the views of the Rishonim must not be taught in a yeshiva, they are appropriate "[w]hen one is involved in Kiruv or deals with people that have been raised in secular environments." What is happening in our yeshivas that has made the opinion of Rishonim so controversial that they must be suppressed and hidden? And what do you suppose would happen to a blogger who suggested that perhaps Rav Elyashiv or the newly faddish Shem MiShmuel ought to be reserved for the kiruv crowd, but kept away from serious Torah students? Can Rabbi Hoffman even comprehend how offensive his suggestion is? Does he want us to attack the Mikraot Gedolat with black magic markers and redact the lefty ides, lest an unsuspecting student come across the Rishonim and their currently unsanctioned opinions? And is this Torah?

I should close by saying that I don't count Rabbi Hoffman among the fools I discuss in this post. Although he  gives us a criminal mis-characterization of Krum's intentions, the essay contains a learned discussion of the Avos and Mitzvos question. Unlike the brown bear, Rabbi Hoffman knows the sources, and he knows how to think. Alas, he's too frightened to be honest about what he knows. Instead of defending the peach bear for using Rishonim, logic, and common sense to widen the Torah perspective of his naive companion, Rabbi Hoffman adds his own well-educated voice to the timid chorus of ignorant fools who respond with fear and anger to any Torah perspective that comes from outside their pre-existing comfort zone. The peach bear may have employed an improper tone, but all he was doing was teaching the Torah of the Rishonim to someone who was not aware of it, and that is to be commended, not silenced.


A final irony: Like the bear who assumes that the Rishonim who disagree with Rashi were from YU, Rabbi Hoffman puts forward the notion that the video was produced by someone seeking to "push some of the left-of-center aspects of the Yeshiva University Hashkafa." Moreover, just as the brown bear argues that the Rishonim are "not from our mesorah", Rabbi Hoffman agrees that they aren't to be taught in Yeshiva, but set aside for kiruv purposes. It's a classic example of life imitating art, and one wonders why Rabbi Hoffman was too dumb to see it.


Search for more information about things that make my blood boil at 4torah.com.

A Torah perspective on the Jeter negotiations: Do we pay for past performance?


A guest post by the Fanatic Rabbi

The Derek Jeter negotiations are in full swing, and it appears that they are becoming “messy”, as Hal Steinbrenner predicted a couple months ago. For those who are unaware, the Yankees are formally offering the 36 year old Jeter a 3 year $45 million dollar contract. Casey Close, Jeter’s agent, thinks that the offer is ‘baffling.”

I can understand why Close believes that the Yankees initial offer is baffling.  Jeter made $22.6 million dollars last year and is being offered a new salary with a 25% pay cut.  At the same time, however, at $15 million dollars per year, Jeter will remain the highest paid shortstop by a wide margin. Hanley Ramirez, a younger, and arguably better shortstop, is due $11.6 million this upcoming season.


It’s hard to argue that what the Yankees are offering Jeter is unfair. But we must acknowledge and consider the fact that Jeter has been a loyal Yankee, and that during his tenure as “the face of the franchise,” the organization’s value has skyrocketed. Therefore, it may be incumbent upon the organization to offer Jeter an even more honorable salary.

Will Jeter wear pinstripes next season?  Almost certainly.  Will the two sides come to terms that everyone is happy with? Most probably.

Nevertheless, for the time being, it is important to discuss, from a religious perspective, whether the Yankees are required to offer Jeter a contract based on what he has achieved as a Yankee. In other words, does Jeter deserve a higher salary with additional years on the contract based on what he has done for the team in the past? Or should the Yankees compensate him solely based on his current value?

Well, Judaism believes in severance pay. This means that if a Jewish educator is let go after years of hard work and commitment to a school or synagogue, the custom is to compensate the individual with a parting gift to express gratitude and appreciation for his or her service and dedication.

So, yes, there is a concept of paying for loyalty in Judaism. However, the whole institution of severance is only when an individual is being let go from his position. Jeter is negotiating a new contract for 3 years.  The concept of a parting gift or a severance package does not apply when a person is not leaving the organization.

Judaism also believes that a person who cannot contribute on the same level as he once did, is still required to be treated with the same amount of respect and honor that he received when he was able to contribute at his highest level.  The example that tradition uses to support this sentiment is that of the “Shivrei Luchot,” the first set of tablets that Moses destroyed.  Those broken tablets were stored in the ark and the Jewish people were required to treat the broken tablets with the same amount of respect and honor as the 2nd and ‘whole’ set of tablets.  By analogy, the Yankees, then, must treat Jeter with the same amount of respect now as when he was in the prime of his career.

In my opinion, the Yankees are being extremely respectful towards him.  A $45 million dollar deal over 3 years is more than ample- respect. Some may even call the deal excessive. They are treating him as if he is the best shortstop in baseball, and are willing to compensate him with more than his market value.

Jeter has already received over $200 million dollars from the Yankees and he has also made significant money in advertisements. Maybe Jeter is being a bit too greedy?

In fact, if I were Jeter, I would be worried about my image. Yankee fans are known to be the brightest and most passionate baseball fans.  They understand the situation as well as anyone. My feeling is that Yankee fans believe that a $45 million dollars contract is more than fair.  If Jeter and his agent continue to play hardball, he may lose some respect from his adoring fan-base.

From a religious standpoint, Jeter has no legs to stand on.  While Judaism believes in the concepts of paying for loyalty and treating great people with tremendous amounts of respect, even during their decline, the Yankees are not required to offer him any more than their initial offer.

As Yankees General Manager Brian Cashman said the other day, let Jeter test the free agent market if he’s not happy with the offer and find another team willing to pay top dollar for his services.

I just hope that this negotiation does not get too messy.


Search for more information about Jeter greed at 4torah.com.

Down with Derek Jeter


I don't know what sweet nonsense agents and others may have been whispering in Derek Jeter's ears, but the idea that he has been "devalued"  by the latest Yankee offer is absurd.  

Derek Jeter is 37 years old, and on the decline. Within two years we're likely to discover that he doesn't have the range or the speed to play shortstop anymore, and he already can't hit with enough power to play third or DH. Yet, the Yankees still offered him $15 million for the next three years. That's Chase Utley money, and the Phillie second baseman is a younger, better player. The best shortstops - Hanly Ramirez and Jimmy Rollins - are also younger and more talented than Jeter, and they make about $12 million per year.

So where does Jeter get the nerve to act insulted? Even though he's old, and well on his way to being useless, his team offered him $3 million beyond what more accomplished shortstops are paid, and they made that offer with the full understanding that Jeter will likely not be a full-time player in a year or two. 

That's more than generous. 




Search for more information about [topic] at 4torah.com.



Search for more information about [topic] at 4torah.com.

Who are the nursing mother and the Sar Apis?


Avoda Zara 43a1:

The gemerah discusses two commonly worshiped images, the nursing mother and Sar Apis.

The gemarah identified the former with Eve, who "suckled the whole world" and thus became a deity. The latter is said to represent Joseph who was a sar prince who calmed the world by handing out grain.

I hate to be a party pooper, but even a non-specialist like me thinks Seraphis and Isis, who is often depicted nursing a child, are better fits for this description. Though the gemarah's guesses are charming, I'm not sure what to make of them. Seraphis was an Egyptian deity originally, who developed into a Greek and then a Roman god. If it possible he was first based on Joseph? Even the grain measure Sar Apis is said to carry fits the description of Seraphis, but then Joseph did make his name in Egypt by handing out grain. Mysterious. 

UPDATE: Art Scroll pays lip service to the possibility that Sar Apis is Seraphis; nothing about Isis though. Rashi is silent, too. Haven't checked others.

Related daf posts from Avoda Zara.

Search for more information about [topic] at 4torah.com.

Judge Kimba Wood gives a great response to a lawyer who asks to be excused for his grandchild's bris


After Judge Kimba Wood, of NYC, receives a request to be excused from court for a Bris, the Judge gives an awesome response (which was verified).

See it after the jump

Really a great move by the Judge.

[All of this, including some of the introductory words came from here via Tzip]

Indonesian Menorah demonstrates Obama haters are a bunch of liars (Plus: meet my new Jewish hero)


Just after the president's recent visit to Indonesia, (the one that cost nowhere near $200 million per day despite what irresponsible phonies like Hannity claimed) my inbox was inundated with an especially ubiquitous viral email claiming that he had "praised" Indonesia "as tolerant." This glad-handing munificence toward his hosts something practiced by all politicians, in every situation, was characterized by the scummy liars who create ubiquitous viral emails as a great stain on the president's character. How dare that-Muslim, socialist, commie, fascist, Rev. Jeremiah Wright adoring Obama praise a bunch of Jew-hating Indonesians for "tolerance" they railed.

Their comeuppance came this morning in the form of a New York Times article (actually their comeuppance came first in the comments of this post, but I suppose more people saw the Times article) The article describes efforts made by a local Indonesian government to make their remaining Jews feel comfortable. These efforts include the installation of a 62-foot menorah on a hill overlooking the town of Monado, which was paid for by the government.  Also:
Flags of Israel can be spotted on motorcycle taxi stands, one near a six-year-old synagogue that has received a face-lift, including a ceiling with a large Star of David, paid for by local officials.
The article also describes my new hero, Toar Pennington, a 27-year old Indonesian man who dons a hat and jacket every Friday night and sits down to a Shabbos dinner.

“We’re just trying to be good Jews,” he says.

Unfortunately, by "we" he means the 10-20 Jews left in Indonesia - a sad fact, that makes his behavior all the more astounding.

Search for more information about the am keshai oref at 4torah.com.

How many of these books have you read?


Here we go with another absurd blog meme.

Have you read more than 6 of these books? The BBC believes most people will have read only 6 of the 100 books listed here. Instructions: Bold those books you've read in their entirety, italicize the ones you started but didn't finish or those from which you've read an excerpt.

See my results after the jump

Beware of Thanksgiving grinches


The grinch says:
As Jews we are forbidden to celebrate Thanksgiving just as we are forbidden to celebrate easter or xmas...This is what happens to those who laugh at our great sages when they issue an eddict [sic] to avoid imitating the secular world on the celebrating of the pagan [sic] holiday of Thanksgiving.

Rav Moshe Feinstein Says
On the issue of joining with those who think that Thanksgiving is like a holiday to eat a meal: since it is clear that according to their religious law books this day is not mentioned as a religious holiday and that one is not obligated in a meal [according to Gentile religious law] and since this is a day of remembrance to citizens of this country, when they came to reside here either now or earlier, halacha sees no prohibition in celebrating with a meal or with the eating of turkey. One sees similar to this in Kiddushin 66 that Yanai the king made a party after the conquest of kochlet in the desert and they ate vegetables as a remembrance.


Search for more information about [topic] at 4torah.com.

Housekeeping: Comments


Ok, here's the plan true believers. We're attempting to move all the comments to Disqus. Wheels are turning, as we speak, and the patient, ie, my blog, should be out of surgery by tomorrow morning.

If this works, we'll have a great new commenting system to play with. 

I'll also need a spot of help and, as usual, I'll be turning  turning to you the readers for assistance.

Stay tuned....



Search for more information about Disqus at 4torah.com.

"Oh how I love (hareidi) double standards..."


A guest post by MEKUBAL

What I am being accused of: mevaze talmid chochom and thus being an Apikorus.
Where am I being accused of this: Over here on the "Daas Torah" blog in the comment thread.
Why am I being accused of this: Because I posted an email that shows that Rav Shternbuch reversed his views on the Dybuk issue. Why is this a double standard?

Well three words, Rabbi Leib Tropper. When insinuations, and accusations were being made about him, there was one lonely commenter on the "Daas Torah" blog that even said give the guy a chance to offer up an explanation. He was ridiculed. Nobody was accused of being mevaze talmid chochom, even before the fateful recordings started to appear, and there was nothing but unsubstantiated rumor about things like misappropriation of funds, and proselytizing.

 So what is the difference? Well, that is fairly simple, trashing Tropper didn't infringe on anyone's mis-perceptions about "Daas Torah." There were no Rabbanim who through their super-power Ruah HaKodesh were supposed to be able to know all things, see all things, and most importantly be infallible. Never mind that this idea is found nowhere in our mesorah. In fact several famous Ahronim went so far as to state that when one of the Gedolei Yisrael admits a mistake, it only increases his Gadlut. Rav Shalom Hedayya, in his peirush on Pirkei Avot, Seh L'Beit Avot, claims sourcing of this in Pirkei Avot, and expounds upon it at length.

However, somewhere along the line it seems that certain Yidden have gotten it into their minds that the Catholics have a good thing going with the whole Papal infallibility deal, and that we should copy it over. Where they miss the plot is that the Catholics only have one person they hold as a Gadol(l'havdil). Whereas every community of Judaism has at least one, and what is more, they don't all agree... Quite the quandary really. Let's stick with the Jerusalem Hareidi world, where all of this began, and look at an not so hypothetical instance... the Shabbat Elevator. You have the Admur M'Gur and the Eida headed(at least when it fits) by Rav Shternbuch saying that they are permitted to use. You have the Admur M'Belz who says it depends on the type. Then you have Rav Eliashiv who says they are assur. So being that these are all Gedolei Yisrael, and all of their individual followers believe their particular one to be the Gadol HaDor, I have a simple question. With this new found infallibility... who is right?

Ok... let's back up here a second. Let's assume that these problems with the import of Papal... I mean Gadol infallibility don't exist. Let's just say for sake of argument that elu v'elu some how covers the ability for two contradicting opinions are both the absolute only right way. Let's then also assume that to thus call any Gadol or Talmid Chochom on their mistakes is really mevaze talmid chochom. So why is it still Ok to slander(in the same thread) Rav Batzri, with some fairly negative slurs, but to say that the person who reported Rav Shternbuch's supposed comments knowingly withheld information is mevaze talmid chochom. Right it is that same double standard coming back again.

 No wonder klal Yisrael is in such trouble.

Search for more information about [topic] at 4torah.com.

The Rachel's Tomb that is now a mosque, is probably not the real Rachel's Tomb


I see from the newspapers that UNESCO has designated Rache's Tomb as a mosque:
A religious site outside Bethlehem revered by both Jews and Muslims has emerged as the latest diplomatic battlefield between Israel and the United Nations. Known as Rachel's Tomb to Jews and the Bilal bin Rabah mosque to Muslims, the site was included in a resolution by Unesco last week, which described it as a mosque and noted that it formed "an integral part of the occupied Palestinian territories".
The proper and correct Jewish reaction to this is: WHO CARES. Let me explain. The Bible tells us (Gen 35:19) that Rachel was buried not in Bethlehem, but "on the way" to that town. Later Samuel the prophet tell us exactly where the tomb is located Speaking to Saul in Samuel 1 10:2 he says
"When you leave me today, you will meet two men near Rachel's tomb, at Zelzah on the border of Benjamin. They will say to you, 'The donkeys you set out to look for have been found. And now your father has stopped thinking about them and is worried about you. He is asking, "What shall I do about my son?"
This conversation took place in Zuph, which as you can see is in Ephraim; thus the "border of Benjamin" is the northern border, a spot well to the north of the current location of the tomb in Judah, just south of Benjamin's southern border. In any case, it certainly is not specifying a location within the territory of Judah, which is where the current tomb is located


Search for more information about fake tombs at 4torah.com.

Comments are back



Phew!
 

NCYI tosses a stone from their glass house


Report: The National Council of Young Israel (NCYI) has condemned a U.S. State Department report that criticizes Israel for alleged religious discrimination against non-Jews and non-Orthodox Jews.

Let's be real. The nearly bankrupt National Council of Young Israel does not have the resources to compete with the U.S State Department. NCYI employs a handful of people. The state department employs thousands. Their report is based on copious research, conducted by experts who reviewed documents, and interviewed people. The NCYI response, on the other hand, is likely based on hearsay, wishful thinking, and amateur observations made by the NCYI president from a Jerusalem hotel window. 

It also seems to me the NCYI should get its own house in order before it condemns the state department. Given how they are alleged to bully, bleed and mistreat their branches -- especially those with female leadership -- I would suggest that they have some work to do before posing as champions of non-discrimination.


FACE BOOK VERSION OF THIS POST HERE.

Search for more information about [topic] at 4torah.com.

Vayishlach Material



The latest edition of Vayishlach Parsha Notes (I plan to continue updating it through the day)

While my comments are down, you can make your witty remarks and clever observations on the FaceBook version of this post, which can be found here.

Another conversation I've had too many times




This time our hero responds to a crazy bit of nonsense certain types of Jews pass of as profound wisdom.

See the first conversation I've had too many times. 

Both by krumbagel 


NOTE: UNTIL THE COMMENT ISSUE IS SOLVED YOU CAN SHARE THOUGHTS ABOUT THIS POST ON FACEBOOK, RIGHT HERE

Search for more information about [topic] at 4torah.com.

Something's wrong, I don't know what


The comments aren't working. (You may have noticed) We're not sure why. The DovBear Tech Department is working on the problem, and I hope he will have it solved before too much longer.

Meanwhile, via the wayback machine, have a look at what the blog was like in 2005 before it got larded up with ads, Chaim Bray, and other gizmos.

A solution to the Jewish charity scams


BY PHILO

Fellow Yidden!

In these troubling times, we are beset with unscrupulous tzedaka appeals. 

Protect yourself from these people! 

For a gift of $100 to kupat haganavim, we will send the gedolim shlita to the kosel hamaaravi shlita where they will sit for 24 hours a day davening that you should be spared from these charlatans.

For $200, they will also daven that you should be spared from any shnorrers ringing your doorbell holding illegible haskamos in plastic and mumbling yiddish at you! 

For $300 they will storm the shaarey hashamayim with their tears for hashem to grant you a cure for the terrible case of gullibility that has stricken you, rachmana litzlan! 

Results are guaranteed! (unless you a have a relative, like maybe a cousin who doesn't cover her hair, in which case what did you expect already?)



Search for more information about scams at 4torah.com.

The typical Torah vs. Science conversation, or what its like to talk to @yeshivaguy on Twitter




I've had this exact same conversation several dozen times - with @yeshivaguy on Twitter, and many others. You bring up rishonim, they don't care. You mention science, they go ad hom. Its absurd, and I hope that if I continue to  post material such as this, they'll start to realize it.

by @krumbagel


Search for more information about [topic] at 4torah.com.

Reform Jews Interested in Kashrus


A Guest Post By E. Fink

Ask most Orthodox Jews about Kashrus and Reform Judaism, you'll most likely hear a snicker from the uninformed or a reference to the "Treyfe Banquet" from the more informed. As far as I know, Reform Judaism has never officially sanctioned Kashrus observance.

I remember reading an article 3 years ago about young Reform Jews pining to add more ritual observance to their summer camp experience. They wanted to add tefillin, kashrus and a more traditional Shabbos. At the time, I thought that was really cool. (read about it here: The Jewish Week.)

Today, I saw another step in this direction referenced on Twitter (HT @schnit). A new book has been published for Reform Jews that want to observe some level of Kashrus. Apparently, this is a first. The book tackles broader issues than simple dietary restrictions such as animal cruelty and treatment / paying laborers.

I think it's great. I would only hope that just as Reform Jews are learning from the ideals of Orthodox Jews as far as Kashrus is concerned, we can learn from the concern the Reform Jews express for animal cruelty and treatment / paying laborers.

(link: JTA)

Search for more information about cross-denominational learning at 4torah.com.

What we all believe


Saw this on one of the lo aleinu skeptic blogs. Its pretty accurate, no?


Search for more information about stuff at 4torah.com.

Meatloaf for the mind: How and why the Achronim changed the way we think about the Sage's infallibility


You won't see this on any of the fraudulently frum blogs written by men who make a fetish out of being "traditional" but an essay has just been published by a noted Torah scholar that conclusively explodes one of their most cherished ideas.

The idea in dispute is this notion that the Sages of the Talmud possessed a divine source of knowledge for their statements about the natural world.  I've attacked this foolishness using quotes from various Geonim and Rishonim who obviously disagreed. I've attempted to show that their so-called traditional view was rejected 800-1000 years ago. But the self-styled traditionalists, largely, respond by sticking their fingers in the ears. 


R. Slifkin's 30 page essays shows how an obscure passage on BT Pesachim 94b was taken by the Rishonim and the Geonim as a concession to non-Jewish astronomers on the part of the Sages regarding a question of cosmology. As R. Slifkin demonstrates, most of the early authorities wrote about the Sage's admission of error with no concern, seeming to take it for granted that such errors were possible.

Around the 16th century, something changed in the Jewish mentality and the familiar apologetics began. Instead of seeing the passage as a concession of an error on the part of the Sages, the Achronim put forward elaborate explanations including such favorites as "the natural order has changed" and "the Sages were speaking in symbolic language." R. Yonasan Eybeschutz even attempts some wishy-washy relativism, arguing that the Jewish and gentiles scholars approached the facts of astronomy from two different frames of reference and therefore both sides were right.

I'm not sure how to explain the behavior of the Achronim, but I think its possible that some of the forces that are causing the slide to the right we speak about today were at work in their time as well. Today, Judaism is moving to the right (by which I mean it is becoming more superstition, less thoughtful, and more cowardly) because so many of the old familiar ways have been undone. We don't live in Europe anymore, and technology has changed the way we live and think. When things are unstable, we fall back on what's easy and familiar. The mysteries and magic of Judaism, including a belief in the infallibility and mofsos-making abilities of the Sages, are intellectual comfort food. They're meatloaf for the mind.  

Something else that happens in times of stress is the glorification of elders and previous eras. With the expulsions from Spain, Portugal, Sicily and some German cities at the end of the 15th century , the creation of the first ghetto in 1516 and the arrival of the first Yiddish book in 1534 it was obvious that the Jewish world had changed dramatically. Not coincidently, this is also when the era of the Rishonim ended. At that moment as Jews begin to think that their own sages were categorically different from the sages of the previous century, the idea of the Sages infallibility started to take root.  We live in a similar time today. The era of the achronim has just ended, we're building new communities, new "Torah centers" in Israel and America, and, like the Jews of the 16th century, we, too, are experiencing a slide to the right. 


Search for more information about the facts of history at 4torah.com.

Catholic Church Recruiting More Priests to Deal with Dybbuks


Exorcists wanted: apply to Catholic Church

 "WASHINGTON (Reuters) – Wanted: a few good men to cast out devils. Overwhelmed with requests for exorcists, U.S. Roman Catholic bishops are holding a special training workshop in Baltimore this weekend to teach clerics the esoteric rite, the Catholic News Service reported. The church has signed up 56 bishops and 66 priests for the two-day workshop that began on Friday, seeking to boost the small group of just five or six American exorcists that the church currently has on its books.

 "There's this small group of priests who say they get requests from all over the continental U.S.," Bishop Thomas Paprocki of Springfield, Illinois, was quoted as saying. "Actually, each diocese should have its own" exorcist, he added.

Paprocki did not say why there was increased demand for exorcisms, which he noted were rarely performed. While solemnly regarded by the Catholic Church, exorcism is a staple of Hollywood fright films -- most notably the 1973 film "The Exorcist" -- and regarded by many as superstition that lends a chill frisson to festivals like Halloween. Catholic Church law stipulates that only properly trained priests can perform the rite -- and then only with the permission of their bishops. Possible signs of demonic possession include scratching, cutting, biting of the skin; profound displays of strength; and a strong or violent reaction to holy water."

Hat Tip C.A who writesI scratch, bite my fingers when I'm stressed, but I've never been near any holy water.  Maybe I'm possessed!  Maybe the DovBear community needs to tell me whether I should worry or chill out.

Search for more information about dybbuks at 4torah.com.

Peek a Jew: Jews singing the National Anthem at Ballparks


Kol Achai at Shea
 

 Zevi Daniels at Oriel Park @Camden Yards
 

 Chai Notes from Jack M. Barrack Hebrew Academy at the Citizen Bank's in Philly

And in a similar vein:

Yoel Sharabi does Hatikva at Shea
 

 A hora with the Phillie Phanatic
 

 Some rabbi allows himself to be humiliated at Pac Bell in SF

Search for more information about [topic] at 4torah.com.

Vayetze Notes


Understanding Rashi
In a famous comment Rashi attempts to work out the dates of various events in Jacob's life; following a midrash, he says Jacob spent 14 years in the tents of Eiver. Shem is not mentioned*. Why? Basing himself on the verse, and "Jacob sat in tents" (plural) Rashi deduces that Shem and Ever each had their own academy. Shem, who survived the flood, was an opponent of the immoral behavior that caused it; Ever who lived during the time of the Tower of Babel was an opponent of the mistaken ideas about God that made such a thing possible. Jacob, who was on his way to live with an idol worshipper, went for fortification in the tents of Eiver. This, incidently, some say is why Abraham, the champion monotheist, is called an Ivri. (They're wrong, but its an intriguing idea)

*When Rivka goes to inquire about her pregnancy, some versions of Rashi exclude Eiver, but this is likely a scribal error; older versions say she went to them both.


Two way Torah
Is the ladder a message or vision, or is it simply part of an event that Yaakov witnessed? Also, where was the ladder? Some midrashim put it in Beer Saheva, others in Jerusaelm, yet the verse say he was in Bethel. Why?

Political midrashim
Uninterpreted, the ladder story sounds for all the world like a "ringing endorsement of the Temple built [in Bethel] by Yeravam to replace the one in Jerusalem." (lurker) Its the ultimate George-Washington-slept-here-story. Not only did the famous Patriarch spend the night on the future site of Yeravam's Temple, he also erected a marker and promised to build a house of worship on that very spot. The midrshaim that seek to put Jacob at Mount Moriah instead, or, in the case of the famous contracting-land midrash, to put him at both Moriah and simultaneously, sound for all the world like interpretive dances performed to escape/erase what the verses plainly say: Yaakov slept and dreamt in Bethel. More

Motif
- Per J.P. Fokkelman stones are Jacob's personal motif. He puts one under his head (or per Rashi alongside it) rolls another away from the well, and uses a pile to mark his treaty with Lavan.

- We have another betrothal scene this week, in which Jacob echoes his mother's superhuman feat of watering ten camels by rolling away a tremendous rock on his own. Jacob appears here as the antithesis of his father, who sent a surrogate to his own well-side betrothal scene, where the woman, not the man, performed the act of strength.
- We also have the undoing of the main Genesis motif: Over and over again the younger brother is pushed, or pushes, ahead of the older. This week Leah was pushed by her father ahead of her younger sister Leah.

- Rachel's plea to Jacob has the characteristics of other annunciation scenes, but instead of beseeching God, Rachel goes to her husband who tells her pointedly"Am I instead of God?" She then falls back on Sarah's strategy.


Incomplete teaching
We all were taught the Leah had eyes that were 
rackh tender from crying; the Targum Onkeles, however, reads rackh as beautiful. [A related post and classic comment thread in the life of the blog]



Word Play
As Berashis Rabba pointed out first, Lavan deceives Yaakov, just as Yaakov deceived Yitzchak. Yaakov was deprived by the darkness of his sense of sight just as his father was deprived by blindness. The point that the deception with brides is poetic justice for the deception with the blessings is driven home by Lavan who says "It is not done in OUR place to put the younger girl before the firstborn" referring to Leah, not as the "elder", but as the "bechirah." The suggestion is that maybe in YOUR place the younger jumps ahead, but not here.

Jacob waters (וַיַּשְׁק) the sheep, then kisses (וַיִּשַּׁק) Rachel. Elsewhere, Jacob's sheep are called "rechaylim." (Mar Gavriel)
Duda'im (mandrakes) is close to dodim (lovemaking)

Rachel names her second surrogate child Naftali which plays on 
naftulim grappling, suggesting a correspondence between her relationship with her older sister and Jacob's relationship with his own older sibling. Rachel's first spoken words however (Give me children or I am a dead woman) echo the first spoken words of Esav who said he would die without food. (Alter)


Numerology
The word "well" appears seven times in the story of Jacob and Rachel's meeting


Ambiguity
During the ladder episode, is the Lord standing over Jacob, or is he at the top of the ladder (which, Alter insists, is actually a ramp)?


Duplicity
Jacob's promise to God is characteristic of his habit of deal making. His pledges to create a place of worship for the Lord, and to tith his wealth is contingent and will be kept only "IF the Lord guards... and brings me back to my fathers house."

Muser
How is it that a fine Torah true Jew like Yaakov married sisters? More

Mysteries
The mandrake puzzles on many levels and so do the verses about maternal imprinting.

Bonus