The fly-over, farmer states may have thought Bush was stronger on terrorism, but why does their opinion matter?
John Kerry's soft on terrorism, right? He doesn't have the guts to portects us. Right? Osama and his boys will use Kerry for a door mat. The Euro sisies will eat him for lunch. Right?
These charges and others like it were repeated daily by the conservative media. Kerry's weakness was an article of faith among the faithful, including a few screechy bloggers, who cited security as their number one reason for supporting Bush, (and also because it got them links from InstaPundit.)
So tell me this, smart guy: Why did New York vote overwhelmingly for Kerry? Why did New York give over 60 percent of its ballots to John Kerry. (Over 80 percent in New York City)
New York is the only state that knows anything about terrorism. It is the state most likely to be hit again. New York trusted John Kerry. Why didn't you?
Thanks Yuter
