Tuesday, November 13, 2012

Get Ryan a Whammmmmbulance

Shorter Paul Ryan: I can't understand it. Except for college educated people, women, blacks, Hispanics  gays, Jews, the poor, unions and the youth vote we had this thing in the bag.
“I think the surprise was some of the turnout, some of the turnout especially in urban areas, which gave President Obama the big margin to win this race,” said Ryan to local station WISC-TV in his first post-election interview."
Now, I know many people believe the word "urban" is code for "non white". But, I'll give Ryan the BOD, and agree that he's not echoing morons like Pruzansky and O'Reilly who weren't able to fathom that non-whites are full Americans. However, Ryan is still whining and he's still divorced from reality. Romney and Ryan lost because Romney was a god awful, gaffe prone candidate, who told endless lies, and because, at bottom, the American people didn't want to buy what they were selling.

Things I don't care about: The Petraus scandal


Can someone please explain why I should care if General Betray-us had a girlfriend on the side? Am I supposed to be surprised that powerful people screw each other? Let them screw each other instead of screwing me. (rim shot)

Also, are there really conservatives Einsteins out there who think Petraeus worked this out in advance to spare himself from testifying on the Benzhaghi thing? Or is this just a little joke?

Finally, where are patriotic Americans like Bill O'Reilly supposed to stand on this scandal? On the one hand, SUPPORT OUR TROOPS is the prime directive, and the General looks so hot in that uniform. But, on the other hand, maybe we can nail Obama if we kick one of his appointees...What to do, what to do. Such a dilemma. 

America is over

Search for more information about ### at4torah.com 




America is over. That's the only conclusion a red-blooded American can derive from a look at the current Congress. All those women! And black people! And Asians and Latinos, and Buddhists  And don't forget Kystern Semina, the bisexual atheist from Arizona!  Or as Colbert said:
Folks, "Papa Bear" Bill O'Reilly is right; the white establishment, guys like us, we're the minority now. And we're helpless against the tide of non-white people who want stuff. And things. They're the thing-stuff-wanters. Whereas traditional white people -- of any race -- we don't want things. We have things.
Oh America. We'll miss you. 




Or, as Jimmy Kimmel said, "Find a black person at Romney campaign headquarters."

Monday, November 12, 2012

Twitter gives me ulcers


Gideon Levy, getting it exactly right, says Israel is not an apartheid state, but its occupation is apartheid system -
  Palestinians want to annihilate Israel but Israel is the apartheid state. Ingenious. 
  The usual liberal condescending response.
  Huh. YOU READ THE TWEET INCORRECTLY you dumb moron. It specifically says "Israel is not an apartheid state"

Too typical

Did Abraham have a daughter? More than you ever wanted to know about his female offspring

Did Abraham have a daughter? Well, maybe. The problem starts with the word bakol in Genesis 21.

וְאַבְרָהָ֣ם זָקֵ֔ן בָּ֖א בַּיָּמִ֑ים וַֽיהוָ֛ה בֵּרַ֥ךְ אֶת־ אַבְרָהָ֖ם בַּכֹּֽל
Abraham was now a very old man, and the LORD had blessed him bakol [=with all things]

What does the word bakol mean?

Everyone and his uncle has a different answer to this question. Possibilities include:

1: Land (which is why this is noted immediately after the purchase of the burial plot)
2: Completion of the trials (works only for those who say purchasing the burial plot was one of them)
3: Wealth, honor, long life
4: Ishmael's repentance

5: R' Levi Berditchver says that Gen 21: 1 refers to the satisfaction and fulfillment of god's original promise to Abraham. At the very beginning of his career, God tells Abraham:
"I will make you into a great nation and I will bless you; I will make your name great, and you will be a [source of] blessing.
A righteous person, R' Levi says, wants nothing for himself. What he wants is to help others. The blessing of bakol, therefore, was that everyone around Abraham became blessed with health and wealth and the rest. A nice idea. 

6: BT Bava Basra records an argument between R. Meir and R. Yehuda. The former says the bakol blessing was that Abraham had no daughter. The thinking, I suppose, is not that daughters are inherently a burden, but that having one would impose extra stress on Abraham in particular. He'd have to protect her from the neighbors and find her a husband. (*So how did Abraham, who [wink, wink] kept all the commandments fulfill the biblical obligation of  "peru u'revu" with no daughter?]

7: The view of Rabbi Yehiuda is that bakol means everything, and everything means everything. Therefore Abraham had to have had a daughter. 

On the spot, Tosfos asks a great question. If Abraham had a daughter, why couldn't Issac do what his grandchildren did (as per one view) and marry his sister? Tosfos gives two answers:

        a: She was too young! Those of you who attended yeshiva are probably a bit shocked. "Too young?" you're asking, "Wasn't Rivka three?" Well, sunshine, this may come as a surprise but the matter of Rivka's age on her wedding day is far from settled. Plenty of bold names (tosfot included!) say she was at least 12*. 

        b: She was Hagar's daughter and therefore an inappropriate match for Father Isaac. (Later Rabbinic wisdom suggests evaluating a girl's character by examining her brother. If this daughter was, indeed, Hagar's her brother was Ishmael. 'Nuff said!.

* R. Shimshon Shwab offers a cute reconciliation. Drawing on midrashim that say Rivka was a reincarnation of Sarah he points out, rather obviously, that such a reincarnation could not have occurred until after Sarah died. Issac married Rivka three years after his mother died so, in that sense (the reincarnation sense) Rivka was only three, though in people years she was already at least 12) 

Maharal Diskin (I think) points out something else that, in my view, supports the "she was too young" POV. When Abraham goes to Hebron to bury Sarah the verse tells us:

ותמת שרה בקרית ארבע הוא חברון בארץ כנען ויבא אברהם לספד לשרה ולבכת
And Sarah died in Kirjatharba; (that is Hebron*) in the land of Canaan: and Abraham came to mourn for Sarah, and to weep for her

*The gloss is in the MT, and suggests strongly that at some point an editor wanted to make sure that his audience did not misunderstand something an earlier audience would have known

In the Masoretic text the word ולבכת has a small kof. When a small letter appears, reading the word without the diminished letter is a common method of interpretation (See Leviticus 1:1 and the small alef) Without the kof the word become u'livitah [=and her daughter]

If this daughter died at the same time Sarah did, we can finally understand why Abraham began looking for Isaac's wife immediately afterward (and also why he waited to begin the search until Isaac was 40). Abraham's original plan was to marry the siblings to each other, and he (per Tosfot A above) was waiting for the girl to get a little older. When she unexpectedly died, a new plan was needed.

Great moments in Torah commentary:  Acheirim [ = "others"; understood to be students of the Tannaim, or alternatively, Rabbi Elisha ben Avuya,] say the girl's name was BAKOL.  Ibn Ezra argues that Acherim must be wrong, because had the Torah meant to tell us that the daughter was named BaKol, it would have written B'BaKol, ie with Ba|Kol. In response, the Ramban says,
"Now had the commentator who prides himself in knowing Torah secrets known this one (i.e. the mystical bat attribute) his lips would have been silent, and he would not have derided the words of the Rabbis. Therefore, I wrote this (i.e several paragraphs about the bat attribute) to shut down the moth that speaks against the righteous ones." 
What a good thing the Ramban didn't own a blog, right? Had he spoken that way against Ibn Ezra online, everyone would have lined up to scold him about his nasty tone.

Friday, November 09, 2012

Who did the dumb people vote for?

Pruzansky: That engenders the second reason why Romney lost: the inescapable conclusion that the electorate is dumb – ignorant, and uninformed. 





Search for more information about dummies  at4torah.com  

0 for almost everything

Back in 2008, when Obama was first elected, Focus on the Family told us EXACTLY what was coming:


  • Gay marriage is declared a Constitutional right.
  • The Boy Scouts of America is forced to “hire homosexual scoutmasters and allow them to sleep in tents with young boys.” They choose to disband instead of following those orders.
  • Gender identity is part of a mandatory curriculum for first graders, including the “goodness of homosexuality” as a potential personal choice.
  • Christian schools are shut down because of anti-discrimination laws.
  • Christian parents have trouble adopting children because of their “narrow” and “dangerous” views on religion.
  • Same-sex couples working in your Christian-owned company must receive equal benefits.
  • The Bible can no longer be preached over the airwaves because it is considered hate speech.
  • Doctors who refuse to provide “artificial insemination for lesbian couples” will lose their licenses.
  • Ditto with counselors who refuse to counsel same-sex couples, including those professionals who work in churches.
  • Churches must allow gay weddings on their property or risk losing their tax-exempt status.
  • Churches must not discriminate against gay people when they hire staff (with the exception of Senior Pastor).
  • Gays are allowed in the military.
  • High school students are not allowed to worship at the Pole or gather for Bible studies.
  • College Christian groups are no longer allowed on university property.
  • “Under God” is removed from the Pledge of Allegiance.
  • Christian doctors and nurses are forced to participate in or perform abortion procedures.
  • Sexual acts are allowed to be seen on TV all hours of the day. Porn magazines are visibly displayed on newsstands everywhere.
  • Your right to own a gun is taken away.
  • If you home-school your children, you must teach from a state-approved (non-Christian) curriculum. As a result, many Christian parents move to Australia and New Zealand.
  • Our troops are withdrawn from Iraq (after which, terrorists take over the unprotected country).
  • Illegal wiretapping is put to an end. Terrorist bombs go off in several American cities.
  • We now have universal health care.  
  • We go into a prolonged recession.
  • The budget deficit skyrockets despite taxes on the wealthy (as if the budget was perfectly balanced before Obama).
  • Christian publishers are no longer allowed to distribute books in major bookstores.
  • Criminal and civil charges are filed against “nearly every
    Bush administration official who had any involvement with the Iraq war.”

They got two right. Most impressive. 

Four years from now, when nothing bad has happened, do you think today's outraged anti Obama nudniks will recant?


Search for more information about ### at4torah.com  

So hey, what was really so terrible about Pruzansky's screed?

Now that Pruz's outrageous attack on minorities and the impoverished has been picked up by Cross Currents, some people are asking: What was really so terrible about  it?

I'm working up the energy to put together a Fisk. Meantime, here's something near brilliant I spotted on Facebook
1. It is not correct nor does the rabbi substantiate his inflammatory accusation that the people who voted for the President are "dumb," "ignorant," "empty headed" and "dunces" using the very language of his "argument." Nor do I believe it appropriate and becoming for the rabbi of the largest shul in one of the most concentrated MO communities to engage in such crass argument, if you can call it that. 
2. It is not correct that the 47 percent of people he demeans as free loaders and takers who just want "free stuff" and contribute nothing to this country. It is unbecoming and inappropriate for a leader of an ancient tradition that is centered around hesed and the concern for the other could so easily (and incorrectly) write off those who may not have the luxuries and benefits that many in his community have. It is also rather ironic, considering there is a significant element of the Orthodox community that leaves off the dole under the guise of devoting their lives to learning Torah. Does he ever once criticize that community? 
3. It is race baiting when he defines the free loading dunce elements of consisting in large part of blacks, Hispanics and the new immigrants who are not white and not European. He counts the president himself among these free loading "dunces," stating that the "President is part of this different America." This is a continuation of the rabbi's many screeds against the president including most recently his October 7 indictment of the president as an "affirmative action president" who is a likely a "foreigner" whether "Indionesian, Kenyan or Muslim." These are irresponsible accusations as they are not supported or supportable. One would expect more from a spiritual leader and teacher of Torah; 
4. It is a form of fear mongering to declare that the United States is doomed because his romanticized version of an "old America" where all were committed to being loyal tax paying citizens who give there fair share no longer exists. Yes, America has suffered a terrible economic crisis, with roots and causes that long precede the current occupant of the White House. But America is not doomed. And responsible leaders in our community have a duty and obligation not to scare people into believing such nonsense. It is all the more disquieting that the accusation is based on claiming that an increasing and significant part of this country's population is not lo
To this I will add the following:

  1. Like too many things Cross Currents publishes, Pruz's insanity is little more than a regurgitation of talk radio yelling points. 
  2. His facts are bad: The 47 percent for the most part DO pay taxes, including sales and payroll taxes, and DO have "skin in the game." Many of the 47 percenters are soldiers or veterans; others are people who worked hard their whole lives and now pay no income tax because they are living on a small fixed income. 
  3. His complaints are one-sided:  Pruz hates people who want Obama Care, and calls them takers,  but he has nothing bad to say about the people of his own demographic who enjoy veteran benefits, social security, Medicaid and Medicare.  
  4. Every generation has its idiots who believe that their own way of doing things is Really and Truly Authentic, while any new approach is an illegitimate threat to the old order. These morons don't seem to understand that everything changes with the passage of time. Authenticity is a chimera. Change is the true nature of things.
  5. The nativism he displays is offensive. Shouldn't an Orthodox Jew know better? It wasn't that long ago, that the American establishment railed against immigrant Jews using the same language Pruz now employs against the next generation of newcomers. 
Anything else?



Search for more information about ### at4torah.com  

Thursday, November 08, 2012

OMG! Is Pruz's hateful screed a re-packaged Rush Limbough sermon?

The Pruz screed  is now on Cross Currents, I presume with the blessing Yaakov Menken who has never hid his ambition to be the Jewish Sean Hannity. 

Via Facebook, Chakira [click here to see his blog] tells us this comment was blocked at both Pruz.com and Cross Currents. 

Gee. Wonder why.
I am reading your blogpost, and comparing it to today's Rush Limbaugh show. It seems like there are many parallels, from the specific numbers cited, to the rhetorical question of who can compete with free stuff. Probably, you listened to the most recent show and cribbed liberally. If not, you've still been influenced by the Hashkafot of this decidedly unorthodox Rebbe. Lets compare.  
Limbaugh: "It's just very difficult to beat Santa Claus. It is practically impossible to beat Santa Claus. People are not going to vote against Santa Claus, especially if the alternative is being your own Santa Claus."
RSP: "The simplest reason why Romney lost was because it is impossible to compete against free stuff. "

Limbaugh: "You want to hear a statistic that is somewhat surprising? Romney received two and a half million fewer votes than McCain did. Now, who would have called that? Who in the world would have? I think Obama's vote tally was down ten million from 2008, and we still lost. "
RSP: "As I write, with almost all the votes counted, President Obama has won fewer votes than John McCain won in 2008, and more than ten million off his own 2008 total." 
Limbaugh:"A bunch of libs are salivating over that. They think the economy is gonna come back no matter what, and that Obama's big government is going to end up being the explanation for the rest of our lives as to how that happened. Just like in Japan, just like in Greece. But look, you bring up Greece and you bring up Europe, and they're where we're headed. Their problems are acute."
RSP "The road to Hillary Clinton in 2016 and to a European-socialist economy – those very economies that are collapsing today in Europe – is paved." 
Limbaugh "Romney presented a picture... This is very frightening stuff to me. He presented a picture of the traditional view, the traditional roots, the traditional way things work in this country."
RSP "the traditional American virtues – of liberty, hard work, free enterprise, private initiative and aspirations to moral greatness – no longer inspire or animate a majority of the electorate" 
Limbaugh: "The reason that Obama won is he did not go to the people who have some intelligence and are liberal and they already knew who they were voting for. He didn't go to the women that already knew who they were voting for, or the Hispanics who already knew or the blacks. He went to the homeless shelters. He went to the people who were on welfare, that he was paying their salaries. He went to the people who are, you know, on unemployment but they got their benefits extended. He went to the people who really don't understand how the economy works.""you're basically saying what I'm saying, that Obama corralled the uninformed vote"
RSP "the inescapable conclusion that the electorate is dumb – ignorant, and uninformed. Indeed, it does not pay to be an informed voter, because most other voters – the clear majority – are unintelligent "

The madness of Pruz

Shorter Steven Pruzansky: My, God! I can't believe they let black and  Hispanics vote in this country!
The Democrat begins any race with a substantial advantage. The liberal states – like the bankrupt California and Illinois – and other states with large concentrations of minority voters as well as an extensive welfare apparatus, like New York, New Jersey and others – give any Democratic candidate an almost insurmountable edge in electoral votes. 
He might have just as easily written: The Republican begins any race with a substantial advantage. The conservative states – like welfare states that take more federal money than they pay, such as  West Virginia and Alaska  – and other states with large concentrations of evangelical voters  – give any Republican candidate a head start.

Round up of some of  comments already left on my FaceBook page

I'm starting to wonder what the Pruz is hiding. Nobody can be as xenophobic as him and not be hiding something insanely kinky.

Uhm: "Romney lost because the conservative virtues – the traditional American virtues – of liberty, hard work, free enterprise, private initiative and aspirations to moral greatness – no longer inspire or animate a majority of the electorate." Romney lost because a country is not a business it is a social construct. Romney lost because more people understood that words like "liberty" are codes for greed, and none have one tiny thing to do with morals and lack any real virtue. And greed alone can only sustain a few and not all. America is finally getting smart--finally.


I hate the whole message, the whole idea, that America is only and forever what we say it is, and not what other legitimate Americans say it is. No doubt he makes the same error of reasoning when he considers frumkeit.

What is scariest to me, is that someone with so much hate in his heart for anyone who holds an opinion different from his own (and an assumption that that individual must be unintelligent because of that different viewpoint) could be a Rabbi and a leader and in the same breathe as these spiteful words, praise his service of God. That is so much scarier than anything going on in this country’s politics right now and it should scare Republican and Democratic Jews alike. What a waste of a position of power.

He certainly one-uped Romney, this piece is an insult to more than 47% of the country.

I can't tell what annoys me more, his condescension or his racism.
To me, it is the racism. I cannot believe that he could write like this given that our community historically has suffered such discrimination. To the anti-semite, they do not care if you are conservative or liberal, Republican or Democratic. We suffered from the same attitude he is displaying in his blog.

Search for more information about nativism in the rabinate at4torah.com 

Meme of the Day

Today's meme is Angry Billionaires. Seems the 1 percenters who bet their beer money on the Romney campaign are feeling screwed. Can I get a whah whah?


I'm not so sure I agree the money was wasted. Romney, let's remember, was an awful candidate.  When I think back on is campaign, I remember his mismanaged convention, the ridiculous lies he told, the Etch-A-Sketch record, and the endless gaffes, not to mention the strange personality. How did I guy like that get close to 50 percent?  

The negative, mudslinging advertising the oligarchs bought  had something to do with it.  It may not have turned the Presidential race, but it definitely helped the GOP hold on to Congress.
Search for more information about ANGRY BILLIONAIRS  at4torah.com  

Wednesday, November 07, 2012

The crazy is strong with them

Yeranen Yaakov writes to the president:

Dear President Obama,

Congratulations on your winning a second term in office. Now that your campaign's dirty politics, mudslinging, and blatant lies against your opponent have come to an end, I want to point out a few wrong decisions that you have made in your first term - and earlier - that make myself and people like me shudder in fear.


DB: Did you fail to notice Romney's dirty politics, mudslinging, and blatant lies? More to the point have you failed to notice how politics work? Every candidate slings mud. You can't win without going negative. But when it comes to lying, Mitt won that race.

First and foremost, you have rivaled your predecessor Jimmy Carter in being the most anti-Israel president in history. 

DB: Where did we get the idea that Carter was an anti-Israel president? He negotiated the Camp David Accords, for heavens sake, also known as the "best thing that ever happened to Israel."  

You implemented a useless freeze on settlements, 

DB: No. Netanyahu "implemented" the freeze. All Obama did was ask for it.  Netanyahu is the one who said, Yes sir, and went ahead with it. And, because everyone forgets this, let me remind you that George Bush also asked for a freeze. Israel said no to him. So why, as an American, should we be mad at the president who was strong enough to get what he thought was in the best interests of America? Why are we blaming Obama's for Netanyahu's weakness? As the prime minister of Israel it was in Netanyahu's power to reject the request. He didn't, and that's on him. Not Obama

 your Vice-President and State Department have berated Israel for building in Jerusalem, Israel's capital, 

DB: That's longstanding US policy. Condi Rice also berated Israel for building in Jerusalem. It didn't start with Obama.

and your spokesmen have refused to actually name Jerusalem Israel's capital. 

DB: That's longstanding US policy. The Bush people also were reluctant to  name Jerusalem Israel's capital. 

You deemed Jerusalem "undivided" only to backtrack on that the next day. Your policy on Iran leaves me feeling less secure than four years ago, and your support of the Arab Spring leaves us wondering if a Muslim Caliphate is on its way.

DB: Stop wondering. Its not "on its way"

 Your first foreign speech in Cairo left all freedom-loving people trembling in fear. 

DB: No it didn't

Meanwhile, an ill Jonathan Pollard is languishing in prison, and you couldn't care less. 

DB How much did either Bush or Ronald Reagan care about this issue?

And to top it off, your arrogant, condescending treatment of Prime Minister Netanyahu is a perfect example of how anti-Israel you are. 

DB: Yeah inviting him to the White House and feting him on multiple occasions, sure was arrogant. Look dummy, you have it exactly backwards. Netanyahu needs Obama. Not the other way around. And when you need someone as much as Israel needs us, you don't act as rudely and as disruptively as Netanyahu has acted toward the president. Just who is the super power here? 

 Yes, you have to deal with him every day, as you whined to former PM Sarkozy. You have rivaled Jimmy Carter indeed.

DB: Not to belabor the point, but just WHAT did Jimmy Carter do during his presidency that was bad for Israel? Did he sell sophisticated planes to Israel's mortal enemy? (Reagen) Did he drag Israel to the peace table by threatening her with the cancelation of loan guarantees? (Bush 1) Did he create the Road Map or become the first US president to openly speak of a two state solution? (Bush 2) Just what did he do?

Your social agenda makes me wonder whether I'm in the same country in which I grew up. Your support for same-gender marriage is abhorrent, especially for a president. 

DB: No, its categorically the same as Kennedy's support for civil rights, and marvelous.

Your anti-life policies are just as bad, 

DB: Pro-choice. Not "anti-life" See if you can work out the difference.

and I can't for the life of me understand how you can force religious constituents to defy their beliefs to follow your liberal agenda.

DB: That's because it isn't what he does.

With regard to your fiscal policies, your "fair share" speeches leave me feeling that your sense of fairness is heavily skewed. It may work nicely in the Sherwood Forest, but in reality, the only word I can use for it is "redistribution". 

DB: Aren't you clever. Is it also called "redistribution" when we tax the middle class to pay for things that disproportionately benefit rich people? What about corporate welfare? Also "redistribution?"

Unemployment lingers around 8% and isn't getting much better.

DB:  Check the paper. We've has several months of improvements. It IS getting much better.

ObamaCare has a few good points, but the fact that it basically levies a giant tax - as the Supreme Court deemed it - on the tax-paying part of the nation - and in the middle of a national economic struggle - is simply baffling.

Your past isn't reassuring to me either. Your learning in a midrassa in Indonesia makes me wonder who and what shaped the views of your youth. Your ties to Bill Ayers, Frank Marshall Davis, Reverend Wright, and Rashid Khalidi should have marginalized you long ago, and yet you endure
.

DB: This nonsense again? Learn how to operate Snopes.

In short, I'm pretty much against everything you are for. That said, I have come to terms that you will be the President of the United States for the next four years, and will have to live with it. Nevertheless, you should not be surprised if people like me move out of the country during the next four years. We love our country, but not the direction we see it moving.

DB: Yeah, protest Obama's election by moving to a place like Israel, where the taxes are higher, socialized medicine is already in place, and Muslims serve in the parliament. Idiot. 

I will pray to G-d that He will give you the wisdom to do the right things for the sake of this nation and the world.
DB: Haven't we been taught "Lev Melech b'yad Hashem?" That a king's decisions are guided by God? So isn't it a wee bit inconsistent for someone like you, who allows the Sages to tell him which shoe to put on first, to worry about Obama?



Search for more information about ### at4torah.com 

Donaghy 16

Best thing about Romney losing? Next time maybe the GOP candidate won't lick quite so many evangelical, T-party, birther, racist rear ends. You guys want to win? Put up Jack Donaghy and give us a Sister Soulja moment that disowns your crazy base.
Search for more information about Jack Donaghy at4torah.com  

My vote

I went to the polls last night planning to vote for Barak Obama.   Like many of you, I credit Obama for improving our economy and our reputation abroad, while making it perfectly clear that he remains cold-blooded enough to use force when necessary. I think he's done right by Israel, and brought the country forward by reforming health care. I am in favor of gay marriage and I don't want a president who picks up the phone when an evangelical or T-Party whacko calls.  So, the choice was clear, I thought.

Yet when the moment came to fill in my ballot I vacillated. Here's why:  I don't have any special understanding of the economy. Though, I read piles of non-fiction there's never anything on my nightstand about money or banking. I understand finance, I think, about as well as the average GOP Jew understands foreign affairs or civil rights or the history of Judaism, which is to say, my grasp of it barely rises above the comic book level.  

And that's what made me, at the very last second, think twice about voting for Obama. See, my GOP Jewish friends know quite a bit about money. They take money very seriously. Several have more than a lot of it. While I subscribe to TNR, the Atlantic, and the New Yorker, they read things like Business Week, the Economist, Cranes and Forbes. As a result, I know enough to spot the flaws in their arguments against Obama's foreign policy and his overall political philosophy, but I'm on much weaker ground when the conversation turns to the economy*. Unanimously, these wealthy GOP Jewish friends of mine opposed Obama, and because they are not bible-thumpers, fundamentalists, or T-Party morons, their objections came down to one thing: His plans to revitalize the economy and increase our incomes. And because I'd like to be wealthy, but recognize my shortcomings in this area, I hesitated. 

* An example: I can usually win an argument about the morality or pragmatism of universal health care, but not disagreements about the underlying economics. I have no doubt that reforming health care is the right thing to do, and I think I can prove it. But I have no idea if we can afford it, or if implementing it will harm or help the economy

To buy time, I went to the bottom of the ballot first and made my picks in the local races. As always, unless I knew the candidate personally. I picked Green or Socialist, or Working Families candidates -- not because I want a fringe, likely insane, candidate to win, but because I want the eventual winner to see a vote for progressive politics. And then it was time to vote for a president. For whom shall I cast my meaningless vote, I asked myself. Do I want wealth or freedom? Money or respect for science, facts and reality? Lower taxes or longer life expectancy? 

Once I phrased it like that, the answer became obvious. I pulled the lever for Obama, and went home with a smile.

PS: Want me to vote Republican? Nominate Jack Donaghy. 

Tuesday, November 06, 2012

The terrible things Obama will do

Over the course of this campaign I've heard from countless sincere but less then bright Republicans who are certain Obama has terrible designs on Israel, America and the Jewish people, designs that will be set into motion just as soon as he wins his second term.

With that moment (possibly) just a few hours a way, I'd like the pessimists to go on the record with their most dire predictions. Tell us precisely what you think Obama has in store for us, and should he win, and should I still be blogging, we'll check back in four years and see how things turned out.

Romney haters, you can play, too. Tell us what you think he'll do to the economy, the social safety net, and the 47 percenters. We'll time capsule those responses too and check back in 4 to see what happened.

Search for more information about ### at4torah.co 

DovBear speaks, Israel listens*

I called on Israel to help the communities afflicted by Sandy , and soon afterwards, I see this headline:

Israel Flying Aid Gives Food, Generators, Gas To Hurricane Sandy New York, New Jersey Victims >More

I think that's awesome. Well done, Israel.

* A joke. Please don't embaress yourself by complaining about it. Thanks

Search for more information about ### at4torah.com  

Monday, November 05, 2012

Casual Chabad Lubovitch racism


Your major newspapers, magazines and TV shows know better than to use a black face to depict generic crime. But Chabad Lubovitch hasn't gotten the memo. * This illustration, with a leering black youth in the background, appears on Chabad.org's facebook page and is captioned:
"When reciting words of Torah while in the store, walking in the street, or riding the subway, one purifies the air."
--Rabbi Yosef Yitzchak of Lubavitch
As the person who sent this to me said  Considering Chabad's historic racial issues with African Americans in Crown Heights and Ethiopian Jews in Israel, the drawing and quote are stunningly tone deaf.

To say the least.

*UPDATE: They aren't depicting a crime. They're depicting a contaminated subway, and a tehillim-reciting girl who is "purifying the air". Thought that was clear

HT on request

Search for more information about ### at4torah.com