This racy advertisement has been brought to you by the people who ban the appearance of all leg skin, and refuse to print photos of females in their publications:
Though not technically incorrect, the sentence brings to mind something unseemly. The same might be said of sock-less girls: Technically, there isn't anything wrong with it; yet some worry about the thoughts such an image might bring to mind*. I think its odd that no main-stream newspaper would publish this ad -- and for specifically that reason -- yet, it flies right under the radar at the self-congratulatory pious papers, who are ultra strict about other things.
HT: Amshonover (who else)
* If you're repressed, unhinged, sheltered, or just a plain old pervert: I don't think ordinary people are driven wild by women without socks; nor do I think the word "erection" makes anyone but a 12 year old giggle. Just if you're going to be a pious paper, be a consistently pious paper.
Search for more information about [topic] at 4torah.com.