Support the Pathetic Annual Telethon

I give up. The previous links didn't work. Please use this button instead.

Az Yashir Manuscript From 7th Century Now Complete


A Guest Post By E. Fink


The 1300 fragments form the song Az Yashir, The Song at the Sea, a popular topic of conversation here on DovBear. The significance of this finding is that it is a rare biblical text from between the 3rd and 10th century. Of note is the fact that the song is written in poem style like in our Sefer Torah today. While in the Dead Sea Scrolls it is written in prose. This is the earliest document of Az Yashir in the style of a poem.

The commenters on the original article on The Huffington Post are busy arguing about whether the Israelites existed or not, which this rare manuscript has no impact on. I say, stop fighting and just marvel at the beauty and wonder of a glimpse into history...


Search for more information about Az Yashir at 4torah.com.

Going to Israel?
Now get 2 phones for the price of 1 (and free calls too) with Talk'n'Save.

Kosher Minhagim


A Guest Post By E. Fink

On VIN there is a pinned article by Rabbi Hoffman about the origins of wearing costumes on Purim. Rabbi Hoffman cites one of the earliest source for this custom, the well-known responsa of Rav Yehuda Mintzt from the 15th century permitting a man to dress like a woman on Purim. He then cites Moritz Steinschneider who attributes the custom to the influence of the Carnival.

There are two lines that seem to contradict one another in the article.

First Rabbi Hoffman says:
"But out minhag did not come from the Roman Carnival. It is not that we believe that cultural diffusion does not exist. We do."
So it seems like he holds that minhagim can come from all sorts of places. A practice can become "Jewish" if Jewish people accept it, find meaning in it and it becomes part of our culture. Just, he has a theory that Purim costumes are Jewish in origin, not borrowed.

Rabbi Hoffman is very honest in expressing incredulity that the custom is older than a few hundred years. He cites some Chasidic sources that apply deep meaning to the custom and is skeptical that such a recent custom is so deep.

Rabbi Hoffman then offers his theory. It is based on a possible error that non-Torah scholars made when reading a piyut. They thought the piyut refers to Jews dressing up in costume on Purim. From there the custom took off and spread.


The end of the article is the part that bothered me. Rabbi Hoffman contradicts himself.
"The origin is a kasher minhag b"Yisroel from German Jewry".
In other words, a minhag based on an erroneous reading of the piyut is somehow "holier" than a custom that was purposely borrowed from the neighboring non-Jews and elevated into a spiritual practice. Why is an erroneously generated minhag more kosher than a minhag that started out on loan from the umos haolam? And as he said earlier, we know that there is diffusion, so why deny it here?

Further, even if this "mistake" actually happened, isn't it likely that the custom only took hold and "stuck" because of the Carnival? I think so.

Sometimes and in some ways Rabbi Hoffman offers a fresh voice of reason, but in this case I think he nailed some points, but in the end he missed the boat.

Update:

If you think about it, Rabbi Hoffman's proposed source for costumes on Purim is also borrowed from the Umos Haolam. We are borrowing the costume wearing from Amalek!!! Haha!


Search for more information about kosher minhagim at 4torah.com.

Going to Israel?
Now get 2 phones for the price of 1 (and free calls too) with Talk'n'Save.

Hundreds of Years ...


A guest post by MarkSofla

While on Twitter discussing women possibly not going to funerals if both parents are alive (nonsense), the discussion morphed to people with both parents still alive leaving shul during Yizkor.

I mentioned something that I'd once heard -

@Mottel @hsabomilner Was once told that leaving for yizkor is a mistaken custom,and was told u stay & say the applicable ones like e/o else.

and received the response -

@MarkSoFla mistaken? People have been doing it for hundreds of years. Even if based on 'superstition', if people do it, it's a custom

So according to @Mottel, if people "do" something for hundreds of years, it's a custom, and that's it. I responded as follows -

@Mottel In 100's of years,leaving shul during leining of haftara to have a drink will be custom under your rules. Right? @DovBear

I think that just because someone perhaps makes a mistake, and others emulate that mistake for hundreds of years, doesn't mean that it is always right to continue doing that thing that may be "mistaken" or wrong. Even if hundreds of years have passed.

Search for more information about Twitter customs at 4torah.com.

Going to Israel?
Now get 2 phones for the price of 1 (and free calls too) with Talk'n'Save.

Had to suffer through a bizarre Twitter conversation last night. It started when a famous J-Blogger suggested that it was sexist for the Olympics to hold gender separate events, and it became heated when someone else attempted to use the policy at the Olympics as a justification for gender separation in Judaism.

I kid you not. 

Twitter Tweaking the Unreflective, Unrepentant Right Wing


Well, I was going to write a post about how the dark, slimy, underbelly of the RW Twitterverse came gunning for yourfavoriteblogger only that would be a wild and irresponsible exaggeration, besides being untrue.

What really happened is @jennihann gave us the breaking and important news that there is no Palestine, in that there's no place called Palestine on a map, and no Palestinian currency. Then, she remarked about the new Islamic-looking crescent logo Obama has, apparently, foisted on an unsuspecting Defense Department.

[I'd love to supply the Tweets themselves only Jenni blocks her account]

I replied as follows [all sic]:

theres no Iriquoe currency yet there are Iriquoe ppl. No place called Iriquoe either.

why would our islamic/humanist/jeremiahwrightworshiping/secular/socialist/kenyan pres put only a crescent on logo? what abt rest?

Good points, I thought. After all, the American Indians don't have a currency, or a land of their own, yet they do exist. Also, I found it odd that Obama, who has been disparaged by the RW for simultaneously being too Christian, too Muslim, and too Secular, would mark the Defense Department with a crescent. Why not a Christian black power symbol and a humanist icon, too? How did he choose one over the other? Couldn't he figure out a way to sneak in all three? I was hoping @jenihann would explain.

Instead, she called me a terrorist loving something or other. [going from memory, because, again, she bravely blocks her tweets, but it was nasty, and it was a compound insult] And, because she slandered me without putting @dovbear at the beginning of her tweet, all of her followers saw it, and three of them chimed in afterwards with super-accurate remarks about my all-consuming love for baby-killing terrorists.

Sigh. Thanks to @marksofla for attempting to back me up, but as I told him, there's no point. What that lot deserves is mockery only.

Meanwhile, @aspacewithin and I can't seem to stop talking about the guy on Sanhedrin 10: who slept with an ox. As you can imagine the Twitter spam from that, too, has been superfluous.


Search for more information about what RW Spam  and Porn Spam have in common at 4torah.com.

Going to Israel?
Now get 2 phones for the price of 1 (and free calls too) with Talk'n'Save.

Mi K'Amcha Yisroel


Click 

Gay Marriage Should be Illegal: 10 Good Reasons




Seen here: http://lolgod.blogspot.com/2010/02/10-reasons-why-gay-marriage-should-be.html, via @neyne


Search for more information about THIS at 4torah.com.

Going to Israel?
Now get 2 phones for the price of 1 (and free calls too) with Talk'n'Save.

Torah-true Explanation Needed


Does anyone have a Torah True explanation for Rashi "V'es kol asher..." on Ex. 25:22?

The verse:
וְנֹועַדְתִּ֣י לְךָ֮ שָׁם֒ וְדִבַּרְתִּ֨י אִתְּךָ֜ מֵעַ֣ל הַכַּפֹּ֗רֶת מִבֵּין֙ שְׁנֵ֣י הַכְּרֻבִ֔ים אֲשֶׁ֖ר עַל־אֲרֹ֣ן הָעֵדֻ֑ת אֵ֣ת כָּל־אֲשֶׁ֧ר אֲצַוֶּ֛ה אֹותְךָ֖ אֶל־בְּנֵ֥י יִשְׂרָאֵֽל׃

Rashi:
ואת כל אשר אצוה אותך אל בני ישראל
and all that I will command you unto the children of Israel: Heb. וְאֵת. This “vav” [meaning “and,”] is superfluous, and there are many similar [examples] in the Torah. And you shall interpret it thus: "and all that I will speak with you there is all that I will command you unto the children of Israel."

The problem:
Rashi text was different from ours. His read ואת כל אשר; ours reads את כל אשר.

My non-Torah True solution:
Shoulder shrug. Rashi had a different text. So what?

Is there a better answer?

Search for more information about textual issues at 4torah.com.

Going to Israel?
Now get 2 phones for the price of 1 (and free calls too) with Talk'n'Save.

Oopsie.



EXPLANATION
:: Our after-shul refreshments are called a kiddush (1) (and for some reason a "hot kiddush" is considered an especially big deal.)
:: The plural of this word is kiddushim
:: In biblical hebrew, a kadesh is a male prostitute [See Deut 23:17]
:: The plural of kadesh is kadeishim
:: "Hot" is slang for sexy or attractive; thus
:: Meal Mart  is claiming their shop specialty is "Good looking male prostitutes"

NOTES
(1) In the vernacular, this isn't limited to shabbos; I've heard the cake and juice put out for a weekday yartzeit  reffered to as a "kiddush" (laughably, Wikipedia calls the shabbos morning snack a "ceremonial meal" and prescribes cake, crackers and fish. In my shul, such a scanty kiddush would be called, "an insult.")


HT: Someone who doesn't want me to to hat-tip him


Search for more information about kadeishim at 4torah.com.

Going to Israel?
Now get 2 phones for the price of 1 (and free calls too) with Talk'n'Save.

Visit to Jew York follow-up


My Noachide correspondent writes again

The responses to my recent post “Taking a Jew Tour of NY” (Feb. 9) were most informative and appreciated! My friend and I (both Noahide) live in an area with a small Jewish presence (west TX and NM); therefore, we want to see and experience as much as we can. Because of time constraints, we have narrowed down our stops to Boro Park and Williamsburg. This will be my first time in Brooklyn, my first synagogue experience, and our first Purim. Since your readers have been so gracious, I am hoping they can offer help with the following:

1. Because it’s Purim, should we dress normally for a Saturday morning service? Will there be any Purim activities anywhere during the day or Saturday night? Which shul in the area would be least bothered by a couple of non-Jews showing up for a service and might have English/Hebrew prayer books?
2. What is the best way to travel betwixt the two neighborhoods?
3. How easy is it to get a cab in these neighborhoods or is bus/subway the preferred method of travel?
4. Judaica shopping??? We definitely want to shop Eichlers… any other recommended shopping in either area?
5. What is considered respectful and modest attire for a woman?
6. OTHER IDEAS or SUGGESTIONS????

We consider it a privilege to walk beside you in this world, and we anticipate a wonderful weekend experiencing the beauty of Jewish life.

My heartfelt thanks,


Search for more information about anthropological expeditions at 4torah.com.

Going to Israel?
Now get 2 phones for the price of 1 (and free calls too) with Talk'n'Save.

Another Torah True Innovation


The Rabbinical Council for Public Transportation is working hard to keep Jews safe on land, sea and in the air:

"The new mehitzas, made of white nylon, stick onto the fabric of the airplane chair using Velcro and can be arranged to make a protective “shield.” The mehitza goes around the head and is mostly in front of the passenger’s face, protruding only a little to the sides. Its designer, who asked that his name not be published, declined to share pictures and his design details, but said the mehitzas were “airy” and did not bother anybody."

Source: http://www.jpost.com/JewishWorld/JewishNews/Article.aspx?id=169101

Doubt this is Torah True, and based on authentic practice? Don't be so sure! Moshe wore a veil, didn't he? Didn't he? I rest my case.

HT: Enigma


Search for more information about [topic] at 4torah.com.

Going to Israel?
Now get 2 phones for the price of 1 (and free calls too) with Talk'n'Save.

Obama visits New Square!





From Purim 2009. I don't understand a word. 1 million DovBear dollars for a transcript.


Search for more information about [topic] at 4torah.com.

Going to Israel?
Now get 2 phones for the price of 1 (and free calls too) with Talk'n'Save.

Some speculation resulting from an odd Onkelos translation


This is a Mishpatim post. It is one week late. No refunds.

Exodus 23:5:

כִּֽי־ תִרְאֶ֞ה חֲמֹ֣ור שֹׂנַאֲךָ֗ רֹבֵץ֙ תַּ֣חַת מַשָּׂאֹ֔ו וְחָדַלְתָּ֖ מֵעֲזֹ֣ב לֹ֑ו עָזֹ֥ב תַּעֲזֹ֖ב עִמֹּֽו

If you see the donkey of someone who hates you fallen down under its load, do not leave it there; be sure you azov taazov him with it.

On the spot Rashi, provides evidence that azov is a homonym. The common meaning is "leave", but citing a usage in Nehemia, Rashi shows that azov can also mean "help." Accordingly, Rashi translates the verse as follows:

If you see the donkey of someone who hates you fallen down under its load, do not leave it there; be sure you help him him with it.

Onkelos translates the word as leave; to make the verse work with azov as "leave" he is forced to finesse the translation by adding some words:

If you see the donkey of your enemy struggling under his load, do not leave him there. Leave behind the hatred you have in your heart for him and help him.

Robert Alter's comment:

The rare Hebrew verb '-z-b is the homonym of a common verb that means to abandom. It occurs twice... in the sense of "to perform, "to arrange, "to assist," and it has cognates with this meaning in both Ugaritic and Arabic.

My take: Had Onkelos known that azov is a homonym, he wouldn't have kvetched the translation.

See Rashi and Onkelos here

Follow-up questions:
Homonyms in biblical Hebrew? How did that happen?

A language ends up with homonyms in two ways: (1) Either a word undergoes a semantic change (example: mouth*, also called a polyseme) or two words with different etymologies develop independently, and coincidently end up with the same spelling and/or pronunciation.(example: lean*) If the language of the Torah is the language of God, i.e., not a human language that suffered from contingent development, neither type of homonym seems possible, but the second type would be ruled out completely. Azov seems to be the second type, with the less common meaning having entered Hebrew via Ugaritic. How can this be true, if the Hebrew of the Bible is the proto-language?

* mouth opening of a river, or the orifice on your face.
* lean thin or rest against

Search for more information about semantics at 4torah.com.

Going to Israel?
Now get 2 phones for the price of 1 (and free calls too) with Talk'n'Save.

Stop Making Me Sick over Martin Grossman


A Guest Post by Rafi G

Some bloggers and haredi news sites have been hanging on every detail of the Martin Grossman execution.

They are busy telling us his last words, what he was doing leading up to the execution, etc.

Is this supposed to give me chizzuk?

It is one thing to say we need to try to get the stay of execution because he is our Jewish brother. It is another thing to make him into something greater than he was. He was a vile murderer, and he probably deserved what he got (he was a cop killer after all), though I feel bad because he was one of us.

I get absolutely no chizzuk by hearing what his last words were or how he put on tefillin before he was taken to die.

By the way, according to a Florida newspaper, he didn't ask for any special last meal. He ate a chicken sandwich from the prison canteen. Does anybody know if prison canteens stock kosher chicken sandwiches?

I don't mean to badmouth him, especially now that he is dead, but the sites that are making him sound like a tzaddik and baal mussar are making me sick.
(my only purpose in writing this point about the chicken sandwich, distasteful as it was (my mentioning it, not the chicken sandwich) was that he was probably not the saint they made him out to be. he should have been treated like a murderer and thats it)

Today somebody uploaded a video from his funeral - there is a guy eulogizing him in yiddish to a crowd of what looks like a couple thousand people, and he is crying and wailing as if we just lost the biggest tzaddik to walk the face of the earth.

It makes me sick.


Search for more information about Jewish victims of anti-semitism in Florida's judicial system at 4torah.com.

Going to Israel?
Now get 2 phones for the price of 1 (and free calls too) with Talk'n'Save.

Oy, I Miss Clinton


Guest Post by Akiva of Mystical Paths

Written while on the Tel-Aviv to Jerusalem train in Eretz Yisroel.

Oy, I miss Bill Clinton. He was a great president to dislike, but not too much. A moral disaster, but a charismatic pragmatist and master politician who knew exactly when to co opt the best part of the other sides agenda and make it his own. Foreign policy was a weak spot, but hey, everywhere he went everyone loved him even if his foreign policy was unrealistic and relatively ineffective. And on the economy, he knew how to ride a middle course.

Since the wonderful days of Bill Clinton the US electorate made the same major error twice. First, they elected Bush with a GOP majority of both houses. Off he went with a nice conservative agenda, but with no checks as both the executive and Congress got to run wild, in spending, in response to attacks, in foreign policy. Then, in response to Bush and the GOP leaping off the deep end of their ideals (and abandoning them for the joy of raiding the piggy bank) they elected Obama with a Democrat super-majority.

Now one might think in the midst of an economic disaster, which could easily be blamed on the previous administration (as a GOP leaning guy I'd be happy to refute that, but honestly prevents), they'd consolidate control and focus fully on tackling the problem. If they had done so they'd be set as the ruling party for 8 years and beyond. Who knows, another 16 year run of Democrat majorities would have been an easy sell!

But no, they had to go leap of the deep end of their ideals, ready to solve every social imbalance of the last 40 years in one fell swoop while tacking the economic disaster according to their own rose colored glasses. The extremely unpleasant results are plain to see. [DB: For example? I see no "results" for better of for worse. From where I sit, status quo hasn't changed at all]

Dear friends, I'm a conservative but I don't want my party to control the Whitehouse and Congress. And my dear friendly Liberals, be honest, neither do you! Divided government forces everyone to compromise and be reasonable. Let's face it, we all want the middle of the road. A little right, a little left - hey whatever. But far right or far left, G-d help us all.

Which is better for the Jews? As the Rambam said, the golden mean...the middle of the road

A nice word about JS-Kit


Before God beings an illness he provide the remedy. I mention this, because I've recently learned that solutions exist for many of the JS-Kit afflictions documented on a previous post.

1) On mobile, the commenting system is as slow as water running uphill.
Solution: You can comment by email. Just allow the system to notify you when someone comments, hit reply to the message and your comment posts!

2) Threaded comments are an abomination
Solution If you're reading comments via email, this is easier to manage

3) I can't figure out how to search the comments. Seems impossible
Solution: None. It is impossible. However, searching you mail is a breeze. See above. (Starting to see where this is going?)

Upshot: Your DovBear commenting experience is much nicer if you respond to comments via email.

A Death Penalty Question for RW Jews


Here's a question for one particular type of RW Jew:

You piously accept Chazal's point of view matters like the age of the universe, the gestation period of snakes, and the reproductive habits of lice, yet when it comes to the death penalty you go your own way. Why?

For the uninitiated, this is the famous Mishna which records for posterity the view of the Sages:
A sanhedrin that executes once in seven years, is called murderous. [The view of R. Yehuda, I presume]

Rabbi Eliezer b. Azariah says: once in seventy years.

Rabbi Tarfon and Rabbi Akiva say: “Had we been members of a sanhedrin, no person would ever be put to death.

Rabban Shimon ben Gamaliel remarked: “They would also multiply murderers in Israel.” (Makkos 1:10)
As you see, with the exception of Rabban Shimon Ben Gamliel, the Sages mentioned here were deeply suspicious of the death penalty and reluctant to use it. One execution in seven years was too many for them and, in effect, R. Eliezer b. Azariah, R. Tarfon and R. Akiva would have suspended it altogether.

Even the view of Shimon ben Gamliel is no endorsement of capital punishment. He still required the almost impossible-to-satisfy rules of evidence, rules that required two witnesses and a pre-crime warning that, in effect, made executions uncommon. As for his comment, there are two ways to read it.

If he means to say the death penalty served as a deterrent in Israel the reply is this: We don't live in Israel. Perhaps the death penalty was a deterrent in the world of the Sages. Today in America our research tells a different story: Death Penalty: No Evidence of Deterrence

I, however, think this way of reading Shimon ben Gamliel's remark is a 20th century gloss. I don't think Raban Gamliel is arguing that more murders will be committed if the death penalty is abolished. I think he is saying that the net number of murderers in the general population will increase, which is what you'd expect if murderers are no longer being put to death.


Search for more information about RW Hypocricy at 4torah.com.

Going to Israel?
Now get 2 phones for the price of 1 (and free calls too) with Talk'n'Save.

That man Martin, his pending execution, and the RW Jewish response


Unless Republican Governor Charlie Christ inteferes the state of Florida will execute Martin Grossman tonight. Grossman is a Jew, the son of a Jewish mother. As a result, objections to his execution have been raised from some unexpected RW Jewish quarters. YWN, for example, has been running editorial after editorial calling for clemency; Rabbis who use the word shvartze with impunity are calling for tehillim and staging protest rallies; and emails and online poetitions are being passed around by Jews who, at other times, are firmly pro-death penalty.

Though I'm pleased to see so many RW Jews have converted to the anti-death penalty position something about the sea change in attitude troubles me. What do we make of YWN use of old-fasioned liberal arguments such as "He had a rough childhood" or "he was on drugs at the time" or "He has a low IQ" (see their editorial on February 10) Should I be appaled to see these arguments used cynically, or should it please me to see that, on some level at least, YWN is conceding they have merit?

The same might be asked about the protesters and the petition passers; also, where were they until now? Had GOP Jews woken up to the injustice of the death penalty years ago, and made their protests and passed their petitions every single time a man was sent to death row, perhaps a Jew wouldn't today be in that precarrious position himself.

I understand tribalism. I care more for my family then I do for my neighbors, and more for the members of my shul than I do for the members of your shul. Like you, I have my teams, and I recognize that there's something elemental and pure and dare I say holy about standing up for your teamate. Martin Grossman, assuredly, is our teamamte. We should stand up for him.  But, he's also a convicted murderer. If it has always been your position that the death penalty is just, and that convicted murderers ought to executed, how can you now trot out positions and arguments you've previously mocked and dismissed? If the state, in your view, has the power to execute someone, why doesn't it have the power to execute Martin? And if all you care about is that a Jew is in danger - regardless of the facts - what will you do when  this case is over? Whether Martin is executed or granted clemency, how can you go back to supporting the death penalty when its only a matter of time before another Jew finds himself threatened by it?


Search for more information about RW Jewish hypocricy at 4torah.com.

Going to Israel?
Now get 2 phones for the price of 1 (and free calls too) with Talk'n'Save.

JS-Kit Echo Comments: Brief review


I really dislike the new commenting system I bought from JS-Kit after Haloscan was discontinued. JS-Kit is Haloscan's successor, and the deal they gave me was this: Buy our system and keep all your comments, or go somewhere else without them for free.  Here's the short list of things I hate:

(1) Today the whole system seems terribly buggy. Comments are appearing and disappearing without rhyme or reason
(2) It's slow as molasses on a mobile. Haloscan loaded in a tenth of the time. This alone is reason enough to hate JS-Kit. In Haloscan days, I did 80 percent of my commenting on my phone. If I wanted to comment on my phone with JS-KIT with the same frequency, I'd be commenting 12 hours per day. Its that much slower.
(3) Threaded comments are an abomination
(4) I can't figure out how to search the comments. Seems impossible.
(5) Once in a while, the system will give me the power to edit my own comments (and yours if I'm logged in as the administrator) Other times, all I can do is delete comment; the editing button having disappeared. I have no idea why this happens, and can discern no pattern.

The list of things I like about this commenting system is even shorter:

(1) You get all sorts of whistles and bells, like a rich text editor, and email notification and much more. I suppose these extras are nice enough, only Haloscan didn't have them and no one cared.
(2) Two of the top guys at JS-Kit Tweet and have been responsive to complaints; also one of their programmers, a guy named Igor, gave super support a few weeks ago..

In short: Bring back Haloscan.

Did you know the Lakewood Yeshiva has a football team?


Did you know Lakewood has a football team? I didn't either, but branded athletic apparel never lies:


The full collection of what appears to be official Beth Medrash Govoha sporting gear, can be found here.

PS: Props to whoever did this. Making the school colors black and white was an inspired touch.

PPS: Is now a good time to point out that BMG incorrectly transliterates its own name? The name of the school is בית מדרש גבוה. This transliterates as Beth Medrash Govo-AH not HA.

HT: Bluke

Search for more information about yeshiva sports at 4torah.com.

Going to Israel?
Now get 2 phones for the price of 1 (and free calls too) with Talk'n'Save.

Today's Toevah


For all who do such things, all who act dishonestly, are an abomination to the LORD your God. 
---Deuteronomy 25:16

A prominent Manhattan cantor promised to buy an ambulance in Israel on behalf of his Holocaust-survivor mother-in-law -- but instead funneled the cash back to his own coffers through a charity run by a disgraced rabbi tied to a massive New Jersey corruption scandal, according to a Manhattan federal lawsuit.

Read more: http://www.nypost.com/p/news/local/manhattan/cantor_sour_note_1MB49LwuvLcfUH8J1OufdK

HT: Mark

Search for more information about [topic] at 4torah.com.

Going to Israel?
Now get 2 phones for the price of 1 (and free calls too) with Talk'n'Save.

Backtracking on "Don't Ask Don't Tell" repeal


Guest post by Rabba bar bar Chana

This is such bull****. According to this Associated Press article, despite the public progress made on the issue in recent weeks, a repeal of DADT is probably years away.

This is an utterly discriminatory policy, with no moral or practical basis whatsoever. It's about blatant homophobia, plain and simple. It's not like we're discussing gay marriage here. It's about witch hunting soldiers simply because of the sexual attractions they have. Maybe the military should also question soldiers about what sexual positions they prefer? Or how about what fetishes they have? Maybe any soldier that doesn't engage in plain vanilla missionary position sex isn't fit to be a soldier! What the hell does a soldier's sexual orientation have to do with his or her ability to serve?
"The protracted time line is about more than giving military leaders time to assess the impact on troops and put new rules in place. The multiyear process also is a strategic way of getting troops used to the idea before they have to accept change. Politically, the time line puts off congressional debate over lifting the ban until after elections this fall."
 The only line in that paragraph that has the ring of truth is the final one. It's about politicians never having the courage to fight for what's right, always worrying about what's going to get them reelected.

I'm including President Obama in that assessment. He made a promise to repeal DADT. And he reiterated it in the State of the Union address last month. As the Commander in Chief, Obama could easily sign a stop-loss measure that effectively ends the policy till it's repealed legislatively. But he doesn't seem to have the political courage to do so. Shame on you, Mr President!

And as for assessing the policy and the effect that it will have on troops, what are we dealing with here, kindergarten? Where we have to be very careful how hearts & minds will be affected? These are soldiers, who follow orders! They're sent into wars they may not agree with, but they go anyway. Do we conduct a "multiyear process" before issuing those orders, to see how the soldiers will feel about it?

This is about bigotry, pure and simple.


Search for more information about hypocritical politicians and homosexuality at 4torah.com.

Going to Israel?
Now get 2 phones for the price of 1 (and free calls too) with Talk'n'Save.

This is going to get worse before it gets better...


According to a report the president of  the Sephardic Jewish community in the Dominican Republic has been linked to a white slavery ring. He appears to be wearing a kippa in photographs. Details are murky, no formal charges appear to have been brought, and all the allegations have been denied; still, this sentence is alarming:

The report said the police had found documents connected to the Sephardic Jewish community in a house in San Salvador where the traffickers had held women.

Stay tuned.




Search for more information about things that make my stomach hurt at 4torah.com.

Going to Israel?
Now get 2 phones for the price of 1 (and free calls too) with Talk'n'Save.

Ancient Torah and non Torah True Views on Abortion


Exodus 21:22-23

וְכִֽי־ יִנָּצ֣וּ אֲנָשִׁ֗ים וְנָ֨גְפ֜וּ אִשָּׁ֤ה הָרָה֙ וְיָצְא֣וּ יְלָדֶ֔יהָ וְלֹ֥א יִהְיֶ֖ה אָסֹ֑ון עָנֹ֣ושׁ יֵעָנֵ֗שׁ כַּֽאֲשֶׁ֨ר יָשִׁ֤ית עָלָיו֙ בַּ֣עַל הָֽאִשָּׁ֔ה וְנָתַ֖ן בִּפְלִלִֽים׃
אִם־ אָסֹ֖ון יִהְיֶ֑ה וְנָתַתָּ֥ה נֶ֖פֶשׁ תַּ֥חַת נָֽפֶשׁ׃

As we shall see this is a notoriously difficult passage to translate, and each translation carries very significant life and death ramifications. For now, let's stipulate that the passage means:

Is the State preventing Haredim from working?


A Guest Post by Rafi G

At a conference for accountants by the Dead Sea, Moshe Gafni accused the State of not allowing haredim into the workforce. According to Gafni, the Haredi public has undergone dramatic changes and realizes they need to be a participating factor in the State of Israel, yet the State does not allow them to enter the workforce..

Does anybody have any idea in what way the State prevents anybody from working? How do they prevent Haredim from working/ Aside from being a bad economy and it is tough for anybody to find a decent job right now, how does the State prevent anybody from working, and how do they specifically target Haredim and stop them?

Does he mean the State has not given haredim a special tax break? I haven't heard of such a request, but if there was such a request and it has not been approved, they would still only be on equal footing as everybody else, and not targeted.

Is there a law haredim cannot work? I am not aware of one. And as Gafni himself says, more and more Haredim want to join the workforce, and as he only implies, more and more are doing so.

Is it because of the requirement to do army service? they are still only on equal footing with everyone else, but they (the majority of them) refuse to fulfill the requirement while others do.

Is it because of education, or lack of? Again, what does the State have to do with that? Is Gafni insisting people hire Haredim who are not educated and trained in the various fields of business, just because they are Haredim? When the State insists on adding curriculum to the general education, the Haredi politicians always refuse and get the haredi schools exempted? Does he expect the State to certify them as lawyers and doctors or accountants without getting the adequate education relevant to the field?

Is he talking about personal bias that maybe some employers have against hiring Haredim? What does this have to do with the State? Just like some people are biased against hiring Haredim, some people are biased against hiring fat people, others are biased against hiring women, others are biased against hiring anybody older than 25, etc.

Again, I don't see how Gafni differentiates the Haredim from anybody else in how they can or cannot be in the workforce, and how the State is at fault for it. Anybody who wants to go to work has the ability to apply for the relevant licenses and open a business, or submit his cv to employers in whatever field he wants and apply for jobs. I am not sure how the State prevents anybody from going o work, other than by giving them too much incentive (in the form of subsidies) to prefer to stay home and decide why bother working..


Search for more information about Haredim at 4torah.com.

Going to Israel?
Now get 2 phones for the price of 1 (and free calls too) with Talk'n'Save.

"Sarah Palin is a F-ing Retard" - Steven Colbert


The Colbert ReportMon - Thurs 11:30pm / 10:30c
Sarah Palin Uses a Hand-O-Prompter
www.colbertnation.com
Colbert Report Full EpisodesPolitical HumorEconomy



Search for more information about [topic] at 4torah.com.

Going to Israel?
Now get 2 phones for the price of 1 (and free calls too) with Talk'n'Save.

Tznius Question


Guest Post by HSM


Why is it that it seems more tzanuah to wear thin tights / pantyhose under a skirt, than to wear jeans or sweat pants under the same skirt? I would be so much warmer wearing my jeans underneath and they don’t cling quite as much as panty hose does. Up here on the frozen tundra we need to stay warm.

I know, it’s probably the whole begged ish thing with the trousers, which personally I do not completely agree with especially as these days women’s trousers are made specifically for them which in my opinion totally negates the begged ish argument. I won’t wear pants by themselves out of the house due to tznius issues, but why can I not wear them under my skirt to walk to the local store?




Search for more information about [tznius] at 4torah.com.

Going to Israel?
Now get 2 phones for the price of 1 (and free calls too) with Talk'n'Save.

Halachah Question: Beis Din


A guest post by Yosef Greenberg

With the hullabaloo going on in Bnei Brak regarding a man who called a few Dayanim to court, the following question occurred to me.

I am unaware of any impartial, qualified beis din in my area that can adjudicate a dispute properly. The reason I believe that caused this is as follows:

  • Dayanim are paid, sometimes paid well. Against halachah. Of course, a proper loophole was found. But in such cases, the reason behind the halachah still stands.
  • Dayanim have an active interest to prolong cases, earning them more money by the hour.
  • By paskening for the richer side, they have a better chance to have more cases brought to them. Richer people are usually more in court.
  • (Rich people are powerful. A dayan has an interest in not getting on his bad side.) In parethesis since it might be debatable.
  • When there's no rich guy involved, beis din usually tries to pasken for the defense. Maybe because of hamotzie mechaveiro, I don't know. But they can go well against common sense too. (I know, courts too.)
  • Beis din sometimes *forces* a psharah, or settlement. By forcing I mean putting more than considerable pressure. Halachah asks beis din to try, not force. The reason for this is probably because if they can make both happy, they might earn more business. The opposite is usually the result.

All in all, the beis din might even be technically within the boundaries of halachah. Yet, they seem to be violating the spirit.

Now to my question: What would you do in such a case? Do you go to court? Remember that the defendant gets to choose the beis din, so much is on his side.

[Disclaimer: What I write above is what I heard/know/saw. YMMV, or Your Mileage May Vary]


Search for more information about Jewuish law at 4torah.com.

Going to Israel?
Now get 2 phones for the price of 1 (and free calls too) with Talk'n'Save.

What was inscribed on the “Luchot” and by who.


A guest post by David A.

As is well known to biblical students none of the narratives as retold in Devarim (D) are without, at least a few, discrepancies to its parallel episode in the other parts of Khumash.

A quite notable example is the remarkable number of differences found when comparing that most important of events, “matan Torah” as found in D and to its version as recorded in Exodus. (some differences include: name of the location of the event, Sinai vs Khoreb; over a dozen textual discrepancies in the Aseret Hadibrot themselves; also, different reason given for Shabbat; the details of the scene as depicted; definition of the tablets, brit vs. eidut; and much more.). The implications of this are obvious.

In this post I want to ask the simple question, What was inscribed on the “Luchot” and by who?
In Devarim, we find the following verses.

First, Moishe, referring to Hashem and saying:

Deut 4:13. He told you of his covenant that He commanded you to observe, the Ten Declarations, and He inscribed them on the two stone tablets.
Then after reporting the text of the Ten Commandments (declarations), the verse;
5:19. These words Hashem spoke to your entire congregation on the mountain from the midst of the fire, the cloud, and the thick cloud, a great voice, never to be repeated, and He inscribed them on the two stone Tablets and gave them to me.

9:10 And Hashem gave me the two stone Tablets, inscribed with the finger of Hashem, and on them all the words that Hashem spoke with you on the mountain from the midst of the fire, on the day of the congregation
It is quite clear that the tablets contained the “Aseret Hadibrot” written by Hashem, (and apparently nothing else).

Oh, and in case you missed it in verse 9:10, we have …

10:4. He inscribed on the Tablets according to the first script, the Ten Statements that Hashem spoke to you on the mountain from the midst of the fire, on the day of congregation, and Hashem gave them to me.
Now let’s read Exodus emphasizing any verse referring to the “tablets” and/or to “writing”.
24:4 Moses wrote all the words of Hashem.

[No clear indication of what Moishe wrote, but the context appears to be either just the Ten Commandments or both the Ten Commandments and the ordinances as given in Ex. 21:1 to 23:19. Nor does it say where Moishe wrote these words.]
24:12 Hashem said to Moses, “Ascend to Me to the mountain and remain there, and I will give you the stone Tablets and the teaching (“Torah”) and the commandment [Note: singular?] that I have written, to teach them.

[No indication of what exactly was written and on what or where and also what is this “mitzvah”.]
31:18 He gave Moses, when He finished speaking to him on Mount Sinai the two Tablets of Testimony, of stone, inscribed by the finger of God.

[Still not clear what had been inscribed on the Tablets.]

32:15 Moses turned and descended from the mountain, with the two Tablets of the Testimony in his hand, Tablets inscribed on both sides, they were inscribed on one side and the other. 34:16 The Tablets were God’s handiwork, and the script was the script of God, engraved on the Tablets.

[Still no clear indication of what exactly had been inscribed.]

34:1 Hashem said to Moses, “Carve for yourself two stone Tablets like the first ones, and I shall inscribe on the Tablets the words that were on the first Tablets, which you shattered.

[We’re still in the dark as to what exactly are on these tablets.]

And finally it becomes clear with these verses…

34: 27 Hashem said to Moses, “Write these words for yourself, for according to these words have I sealed a covenant with you and Israel.” 34:28 He remained there with Hashem for forty days and forty nights – he did not eat bread and he did not drink water – and he wrote on the Tablets the words of the covenant, the Ten Commandments.

Based on context, “he” must of course refer to Moishe.

So, Exodus tells us that Moishe wrote the Aseret Hadibrot on the tablets, (in addition to whatever Hashem may have written previously on them.)

Not exactly what is recorded in Devarim.


Search for more information about [topic] at 4torah.com.

Going to Israel?
Now get 2 phones for the price of 1 (and free calls too) with Talk'n'Save.

Investigative report into the dybbuk


A Guest Post by Rafi G

I am going to preface the brief post with an apology. In the nearly 2 years that I have been a contributor on the Dov Bear blog, I have refrained from including, in my posts, links to my own blog, Life in Israel. I know I was allowed to, but my purpose in being a contributor here was not to direct traffic to LII, but to have an opportunity to share my thoughts with Dov Bear's audience, and not just with my own.

Today though, I am going to break that rule I set for myself. I am going to send you to my own blog to see what I wrote there. I apologize for the inconvenience to the readers (big inconvenience, clicking a link, boo hoo), and to Dov Bear for stealing his readers.

Last night, an investigative reporting television show in Israel ran a report on the recent dybbuk exorcism and mekubalim in general. Read my thoughts and see the video clip of the show in my post at LII.


Search for more information about exorcisms at 4torah.com.

Going to Israel?
Now get 2 phones for the price of 1 (and free calls too) with Talk'n'Save.

Quality Post


http://kylopod.blogspot.com/2010/02/scheming-grasping-liberals.html

medical school to suppress Haredi growth


A Guest Post by Rafi G

Are Haredim paranoid, thinking everything non-haredi the State does is to oppose Haredim and their growth, or are non-haredim naive for thinking the State is not trying to suppress Haredi growth and expansion?

The State has announced they will be opening the countries fifth medical school, this one in Tsfat and administered by Bar Ilan University. This will also be a precursor to expanding to a full blown university in the heart of the Galil. The intention is to improve educational opportunities in the Galil region, which will improve the quality of life in the area.

The Haredim are upset, claiming this is being done to suppress the Haredi expansion and growth in the Safed area.

I say, Haredim all over Israel are finally getting involved in higher education. Instead of being upset about it, apply to go to school and become doctors. And when it eventually becomes a full fledged university, become businessmen, accountants, lawyers, psychologists, scientists and whatever else they will offer. Take advantage of a tremendous opportunity laying at your door - they are handing you a university, and will need students to fill it.


Search for more information about suppressed Haredim at 4torah.com.

Going to Israel?
Now get 2 phones for the price of 1 (and free calls too) with Talk'n'Save.

A proto-pluralistic midrash


הה"ד: (דברים ד) השמע עם קול אלהים.

המינין שאלו את ר' שמלאי:
א"ל: אלוהות הרבה יש בעולם?
אמר להם: למה?
אמרו לו: שהרי כתיב: השמע עם קול אלהים!
אמר להם: שמא כתוב מדברים אלא מדבר.
אמרו לו תלמידיו: רבי לאלו דחית בקנה רצוץ, לנו מה אתה משיב?

חזר ר' לוי ופירשה:
אמר להם: השמע עם קול אלהים, כיצד?
אילו היה כתוב קול ה' בכחו לא היה העולם יכול לעמוד, אלא קול ה' בכח, בכח של כל אחד ואחד.
הבחורים לפי כחן,
והזקנים לפי כחן,
והקטנים לפי כחן.
אמר הקב"ה לישראל: לא בשביל ששמעתם קולות הרבה תהיו סבורין שמא אלוהות הרבה יש בשמים, אלא תהיו יודעים 
שאני הוא ה' אלהיך, שנאמר: (שם ה) אנכי ה' אלהיך.



I don't think the Sages were pluralists, and I don't think they subscribed to modern ideas about our subjective, and therefore inevitably fallible perception. Still, its hard for me, a man of 2010, to read this midrash (its recorded in Shmos Raba 29:1) without remembering Isiah Berlin, and what he taught about human understanding. Here it is in translation:

The sectarians challenged Rav Samlai: "There are many Gods in the world, as it is written: השמע עם קול אלהים [The nation heard the voice of God. The word for God - Elohim - is plural]." Rav Samlai replied: [Elsewhere the verb attached to Elohim is singular, proving the word Elohim is to be understood in the singular.] Rav Samlai's students said, "Teacher, you defeated the sectarians with [a weak argument]. What will you tell us?"

Rav Levi expounded: "How shall we understand the phrase, The nation heard the voice of God?" In Psalms we have a verse, which doesn't read: קול ה' בכחו [the voice of God is his power] for if that were true the word couldn't have stood [when God spoke.] Rather, the verse in Pslams reads קול ה' בכח [the voice of God in (or with) power] meaning, that the voice of God comes according to the power of each of us.

To the young people according to their power [of understanding]
To the old people according to their power [of understanding]
To the children according to their power [of understanding]

[The verse the sectarians originally mentioned should be understood as if] God says to Israel "Though, you heard many voices [i.e. your subjective powers of understanding led to different conclusions] don't let yourself become convinced that there is more than one God; always know that I am the Lord your God. [i.e. I am one]

How does a pluralist understand this midrash? First, it serves as a reminder that human beings perceive things differently. That's a function of our humanity. Each of us are different, and each of us relate differently to the world. Some understand God one way, others see Him and understand His demands in another way.  Second, the midrash, as I read it,  seems to say that so long as we remember that there is one God, a phrase Rav Levi meant symbolically, these different perceptions are valid.

The pluralist, to quote Issiah Berlin, holds that "that there is a plurality of values which men can and do seek." This collection of human values men seek isn't infinite, and its possible to pursue your own preferred values, while also detesting a set of values held by someone else -- and even going to war with it. Pluralism, unlike relativism, objects to the notion that "anything goes"; rather,  it simply recognizes that men can and do pursue many different sets of values, and that these difference value sets aren't necessarily hostile to one another.

Though the Sages certainly would have disapproved of Jews who ate pork or violated Shabbos, this midrash suggests that there was some room in their imagination for legitimate diversity, i.e. for Jews to legitimately pursue different values.

This is a welcome reprieve from the one-size-fits all style of Orthodox Judaism with which we contend today.

Berlin also says: "If.. respect between systems of values which are not necessarily hostile to each other is possible, then toleration and liberal consequences follow, as they do not either from monism (only one set of values is true, all the others are false) or from relativism (my values are mine, yours are yours, and if we clash, too bad, neither of us can claim to be right)."

It seems possible (at least according to Rav Levi)  that when two Jews to subscribe to different value sets, this diversity can be tolerated, so long as the different value sets are not inherently hostile to each other, i.e. so long as both value sets are included in whatever Rav Levi beleives is indicated by the words, "I am the Lord your God."   

Eyefloater Review


According to the Mayo Clinic:
Eye floaters look like black or gray specks, strings or cobwebs that drift about when you move your eyes. Most eye floaters are caused by age-related changes that occur as the jelly-like substance (vitreous floaters) inside your eyes becomes more liquid. When this happens, microscopic fibers within the vitreous humor tend to clump together and can cast tiny shadows on your retina, which you may see as eye floaters
If you are suffering from eyefloaters, and find yourself unable to tolerate them, consider visiting http://www.eyefloaters.info/.

The site offers a top secret, litter known product that can help you with eyefloaters once and for all. Or so they site claims. I don’t know what the secret solution is or if it’s a pill, or drops, but the owner of the site swears it works, using language most commonly reserved for a carnival barker. For instance
That’s right... I went from getting tons of eye floaters every single day to complete peace and happiness.
I was so amazed that I couldn’t believe it myself. I knew a couple of people who were suffering too (since I spent so much time asking everyone for advice). I made a point to tell these people about the results I had, I gave them my secret and begged them to give me a call and let me know how it went for them.
Later on all of these people gave me a call and proclaimed, "Thank You! Thank You! Thank You!" Everyone had the same results as me!
… so unless it’s a complete lie and you end up spending lots of money on a snake-oil solution that blinds you forever, how can you go wrong?  This sentence added to allow me to reach the 300 word minimum which I did exactly.

When was the Torah given?


A guest post by Noah Roth 
Note: I did the translations and transliterations (Aside from the long passage from BT Shabbos, which is Soncino) and take responsibility for any errors.

There are two holidays which we celebrate in a manner distinctly different from their biblical descriptions: Simchas Torah and Shavuos

Both holidays are tied to the Torah. Simchas Torah because we finish an annual cycle, and Shavuos due to the tradition that Matan Torah/The Giving of the Torah, occurred on the sixth day of Sivan

However, they differ because the customs of Simchas Torah are a customary evolution, not found in the primary rabbinic sources. The customs had already begun by the Geonic period, when R” Hai Gaon wrote extensively condemning the practices of Simchas Torah. The justification for these customs is found in the מהרי"ק as cited by the רמ"א permitting at least the custom to dance since (1) one will not come to repair musical instruments, a labor forbidden on shabbos, if the dancing is for the honor of the Torah (a סברא/reasoning which contradicts the explicit prohibition on BT Betzah 36b), and (2) because “מנהג דוחה הלכה”/ "a custom overrides a law" an unprecedented statement with no earlier textual basis, often cited by the Tosafists as the basis for ruling against Talmudic law.

But Shavuos is different. Thought the Torah mentions neither the date of Shavuos nor that it falls out on the date of Matan Torah/The Giving of the Torah, there is a midrashic precedent for this idea in Mechilta d'Rabbi Yismael (a collection of halachic midrash on Exodus)

The problem with this interpretation arises from BT Shabbos 86b where a dispute is recorded between R. Jose and the Sages as to the date of Matan Torah/The Giving of the Torah. All agree that Jewish people arrived at Sinai on the first day of Sivan. All agree that the Torah was given on Shabbos (both are derived by gezerah shavah). However R. Jose rules that that the first day of Sivan was on Sunday, and the Sages say it was Monday:
ת"ר בששי בחדש ניתנו עשרת הדברות לישראל רבי יוסי אומר בשבעה בו אמר רבא דכולי עלמא בר"ח אתו למדבר סיני כתיב הכא (שמות יט, א) ביום הזה באו מדבר סיני וכתיב התם (שמות יב, ב) החדש הזה לכם ראש חדשים מה להלן ר"ח אף כאן ר"ח ודכולי עלמא בשבת ניתנה תורה לישראל כתיב הכא (שמות כ, ז) זכור את יום השבת לקדשו וכתיב התם (שמות יג, ג) ויאמר משה אל העם זכור את היום הזה מה להלן בעצומו של יום אף כאן בעצומו של יום כי פליגי בקביעא דירחא רבי יוסי סבר בחד בשבא איקבע ירחא ובחד בשבא לא אמר להו ולא מידי משום חולשא דאורחא בתרי בשבא אמר להו (שמות יט, ו) ואתם תהיו לי ממלכת כהנים בתלתא אמר להו מצות הגבלה בארבעה עבוד פרישה ורבנן סברי בתרי בשבא איקבע ירחא בתרי בשבא לא אמר להו ולא מידי משום חולשא דאורחא בתלתא אמר להו ואתם תהיו לי בארבעה אמר להו מצות הגבלה בה' עבוד פרישה

On the sixth day of the month [Siwan] were the Ten Commandments given to Israel. R. Jose maintained: On the seventh thereof. Said Raba: All agree that they arrived in the Wilderness of Sinai on the first of the month. [For] here it is written, on this day they came into the wilderness of Sinai; whilst elsewhere it is written, This month shall be unto you the beginning of months: just as there the first of the month, so here [too] the first of the month [is meant]. Again, all agree that the Torah was given to Israel on the Sabbath. [For] here it is written, Remember the Sabbath day, to keep it holy; whilst elsewhere it is written, And Moses said unto the people, Remember this day: just as there, [he spoke] on that very day, so here too it was on that very day. [Where] they differ is on the fixing of the New Moon. R. Jose holds that New Moon was fixed on the first day of the week [Sunday], and on that day he [Moses] said nothing to them on account of their exhaustion from the Journey. On Monday he said to them, and ye shall be unto me a kingdom of priests Tuesday he informed them of the order to set boundaries, and on Wednesday they separated themselves [from their wives]. But the Rabbis hold: New Moon was fixed on Monday, and on that day he said nothing to them on account of their exhaustion from the journey. On Tuesday he said to them, and ye shall be unto me a kingdom of priests; on Wednesday he informed them of the order to set boundaries, and on Thursday they separated themselves.
As a general principle, when an unresolved Talmudic dispute is recorded between an individual and the Sages, we rule according to the majority, ie the Sages. However on BT Gitten 67a we are taught an explicit exception for R. Jose, who is followed over the Sages, because "נימוקו עמו" or “his (superior) logic is with him.”

How then do we rule like Sages in the case of Shavuos?

The simple answer is that we do not. The halacha is according to R. Jose that the Torah was given on 7 Sivan, and that as a result we celebrate the Giving of the Torah on Shavuos (in accordance with the Mchilta). However, Shavuos does not have a fixed date. It falls out 50 days after the Korban Haomer is brought, which in the fixed calendar always coincides with 6 Sivan. Prior to the fixed calendar, Shavuos could fall on 5 Sivan (If Iyar and Sivan were 29 day months), on 6 Sivan (If Iyar and Sivan were split, with one a 29 day month and the other a 30 day month) or on 7 Sivan (If Iyar and Sivan were both 30 day months.)

The Giving of the Torah is tied to Shavuos because it would naturally fall out on the “correct” date roughly one third of the time. We rule like R. Jose  and thanks to the set calendar we always celebrate the Giving of the Torah on Shavuos, which falls out on 6 Sivan the wrong day for the Giving of the Torah

Search for more information about the Talmud at 4torah.com.

Going to Israel?
Now get 2 phones for the price of 1 (and free calls too) with Talk'n'Save.

Bit of housekeeping


An update has been added to this post.

(I have not posted in two days. This is why the update was delayed until now.)


Search for more information about [topic] at 4torah.com.

Going to Israel?
Now get 2 phones for the price of 1 (and free calls too) with Talk'n'Save.

The Earthquake: An Alternative Approach


A Guest Post By E. Fink


Since the Earthquake in Haiti many have attempted to figure out "why" the tragedy occurred.

There are 4 prominent versions going around the web right now.

Rabbi Shafran Version 1: God punished the people of Haiti because of evil speech.

Rabbi Shafran Version 2: We don't know why God punished the people of Haiti but the lesson is that we should learn is not to speak evil speech.

Rabbi Levin: The earthquake and Tsunami and 9/11 happened because of Gays in the military.

Rabbi Feldman: We can't know why the earthquake happened, but it happened for "a reason".

What has been missing from this is a more rational approach

lessons learned from riding a mehadrin bus


A Guest Post by Rafi G

The incident described within this post was told to me firsthand by the person to whom it happened and by whom it was witnessed. I am relating only the more relevant details..

A woman took a mehadrin bus yesterday. She got on the bus and sat in the first row of seats with her child. The bus was empty, so she figured it was ok, and the driver didn't care. She said she prefers the front because she gets nauseous in the back, and since the bus was empty...

At a much later stop, the bus suddenly filled up. It was near a simcha hall, so it was probably people getting out of the simcha, or just a very popular stop. One person made a big deal about her sitting in the front and pestered her until she moved. She moved further back, but at another stop this guy told all the women sitting in that area (the first section of the womens area) to move further back as there were some empty seats and if they moved back to fill those seats, the men could have more seats available and some standing would have seats.

There was a bit of a ruckus, with this guy making all the trouble. It seems he felt like he was in charge of the bus and passengers, as he kept moving people around telling them where to sit. When this woman got up to help a different woman with her kids, the guy took her kid and bag off the seat and put them on the floor, freeing up the seat for a man, forcing her to stand much of the way after that.

After that, as the bus came to the later stops and people were disembarking and the bus was less full, this guy was walking back and forth from the front to the back to talk to his wife and see the kids. This woman told me that he was the only man on the bus who spent considerable time walking through the womens section a number of times.

Lesson #1 - mehadrin buses are not about frumkeit. they are about control.

On the same bus ride, it seems that it is pretty common that people find ways to avoid paying the bus fare. Some get on the bus using the back door - as the driver has to open it for the women, and don't bother coming to the front to pay, hoping the driver hadn't seen them or hadn't noticed that they hadn't paid. Others blame the spouse - oh, I thought my husband was paying for me, or my wife was paying for me.

The bus driver already knows the tricks and knows people aren't paying. At some point he pulled the bus over to the side of the road, as he was about to leave the city, and walked up and down the bus asking people why they did not pay and demanding that they do. A large percentage of the people on the bus had all sorts of excuses, but once confronted by the driver, they all paid up.

Lesson #2 - under the guise of frumkeit, they are just trying to cop free rides (aka theft), as it is easier to to do so on a mehadrin bus than a regular bus. While this may not have been the original intent, they are definitely taking advantage of it.


Search for more information about things done under the guise of frumkeit at 4torah.com.

Going to Israel?
Now get 2 phones for the price of 1 (and free calls too) with Talk'n'Save.

The Mighty Ducks of Kiryas Joel


A Guest Post By E. Fink

This is a 2 week old story but after reflecting on the facts and rumors involved I find it current enough for a blog post.

A kol koreh issued by KJ stated that there was a potential issue with the ducks that were being shechted and sold by KJ Poultry. The problem was that the ducks being sold were Muscovy Duck as opposed to the usual Pekin Duck. The difference between the two ducks is that Muscovy is a "dores" or halachic predator whereas the Pekin is not. This renders the Muscovy not-kosher.

There are conflicting reports as to what actually occurred in KJ. There are those who say that the ducks were purposely or perhaps negligently purchased and KJ is at fault. There are those that say that KJ made an honest mistake in halacha and thought these ducks were kosher. There are those that say KJ was tricked by the supplier. There are those who say the entire story is a fabrication (you know who you are).

The bottom line is: Non - Kosher Ducks were pulled off the shelves in KJ and elsewhere. This indicates a breach in the hasgacha process. Following previous scandals I find this INEXCUSABLE.

Second, KJ preaches a brand of Judaism that is so intolerant of any outside influence (they recently banned music lessons!) and they still had a huge kashrus problem. Isn't the lesson clear? You can't control everything? And even if you do there are going to be problems. If they would spend less time regulating kosher activities that they disapprove of (music lessons, concerts, Torah websites) maybe they would have more time to make sure they are selling kosher meat!

Further, when they became aware of the problem, edicts were issued and the problem was corrected quickly. Why can't we correct other problems in our community as quickly? (Take the molesters "off the shelves" immediately!)


Search for more information about the Mighty Ducks at 4torah.com.

Going to Israel?
Now get 2 phones for the price of 1 (and free calls too) with Talk'n'Save.

Too much kool-aid




See, here's the sad part: She's swallowed whole all the familiar apologetics and is spouting them back without even realizing it. Telling us how spiritual women are and how men will get an upgrade once the Messiah's arrived - does she realize she's fallen for the oldest scam in the book? As the Ramban explains in "Disputation":  "In our country, they say that he who wishes to tell a lie has his witnesses live far away," meaning that a fine way to prove a point is to bring evidence that's impossible to falsify. Ramban was speaking about the claims of Christianity, but the same can be said about the claims of Jewish anti-feminists. Just as its impossible to prove that Jesus defeated death and took the keys of hell from Satan, it can't be proven that being female offers any spiritual advantages. What can be proven, however, is that Jewish woman are kept at a disadvantage, disadvantages Jewish women are asked to accept this in exchange for invisible benefits they can neither see nor touch.

Aside: At the end, the woman on the film suggests that Jewish women who are dissatisfied with their back of the bus status secretly wish to be men. There's some truth to that, of course. Jewish women wish to be men in the same way that Jim Crow blacks wished to be white, meaning they want the same freedoms and opportunities that are available to men. Though Judaism has made much progress in this regard, the RW and Ultra circles still run like MadMen. Telling women they're more spiritual, pat pat, run along, is just a way to protect the status quo.

Update 2/5: As noted on the comment thread, this video is a piece of performance art by Maya Escobar. Maya is not a kool-aid drunk anti-feminist, but her portrayal of one is nearly perfect: She looks and sounds like every NCSY lady I've ever known. The arguments she presents are precisely the arguments given by Orthodox anti-feminists. For example: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cRUTMADR5gY (thanks to RBC for the link) My post was a criticism of these arguments, which aren't really arguments at all, but apologetics. Though it's true that my criticism was inspired by a reenactment, I don't see how that makes the criticism any less legitimate.

Search for more information about women at 4torah.com.

Going to Israel?
Now get 2 phones for the price of 1 (and free calls too) with Talk'n'Save.

Today's head slap moment


Last week, we were discussing the Song of the Sea, and a question came up about verse 19: Is it part of the song?

As the conversation progressed, Lurker said: "Jewish tradition does not consider verse 19 to be part of the song? Then perhaps you can explain why the MT formats it as part of song, as can be seen in the Aleppo Codex, the Leningrad Codex, and every known sefer Torah extant."

My response: [This is] just proof that the Masorites thought it was part of the song. You need to tell me why they were right.

Though correct, my answer was weak. I could have made a much stronger point, which brings us to the head slapping moment of the day:

Though its true that the MT formats verse 19 as part of the song, it also formats verse 1 as part of the song!

Does anyone really think that Moshe and the Israelites stood at the side of the Red Sea and opened their song of praise with the words, "Then [or "that was when"] Moses and the Israelites sang this song to the LORD..."

Of course not.

And if we can say that the MT formats an introductory verse as part of the song, why can't we say the same about the last verse, a verse that reads like an epilogue, has no poetic qualities  and is a mismatch with the rest of the poem as far as length, rhythm, vocabulary and emphasis?

POSTSCRIPT: Turns out this question was argued about by the Rishonim: Ibn Ezra said yes; Ramban said no


Search for more information about arguments I've won at 4torah.com.

Going to Israel?
Now get 2 phones for the price of 1 (and free calls too) with Talk'n'Save.