Tuesday, November 16, 2010

Reform Jews Interested in Kashrus

A Guest Post By E. Fink

Ask most Orthodox Jews about Kashrus and Reform Judaism, you'll most likely hear a snicker from the uninformed or a reference to the "Treyfe Banquet" from the more informed. As far as I know, Reform Judaism has never officially sanctioned Kashrus observance.

I remember reading an article 3 years ago about young Reform Jews pining to add more ritual observance to their summer camp experience. They wanted to add tefillin, kashrus and a more traditional Shabbos. At the time, I thought that was really cool. (read about it here: The Jewish Week.)

Today, I saw another step in this direction referenced on Twitter (HT @schnit). A new book has been published for Reform Jews that want to observe some level of Kashrus. Apparently, this is a first. The book tackles broader issues than simple dietary restrictions such as animal cruelty and treatment / paying laborers.

I think it's great. I would only hope that just as Reform Jews are learning from the ideals of Orthodox Jews as far as Kashrus is concerned, we can learn from the concern the Reform Jews express for animal cruelty and treatment / paying laborers.

(link: JTA)

Search for more information about cross-denominational learning at 4torah.com.

What we all believe

Saw this on one of the lo aleinu skeptic blogs. Its pretty accurate, no?


Search for more information about stuff at 4torah.com.

Monday, November 15, 2010

Meatloaf for the mind: How and why the Achronim changed the way we think about the Sage's infallibility

You won't see this on any of the fraudulently frum blogs written by men who make a fetish out of being "traditional" but an essay has just been published by a noted Torah scholar that conclusively explodes one of their most cherished ideas.

The idea in dispute is this notion that the Sages of the Talmud possessed a divine source of knowledge for their statements about the natural world.  I've attacked this foolishness using quotes from various Geonim and Rishonim who obviously disagreed. I've attempted to show that their so-called traditional view was rejected 800-1000 years ago. But the self-styled traditionalists, largely, respond by sticking their fingers in the ears. 


R. Slifkin's 30 page essays shows how an obscure passage on BT Pesachim 94b was taken by the Rishonim and the Geonim as a concession to non-Jewish astronomers on the part of the Sages regarding a question of cosmology. As R. Slifkin demonstrates, most of the early authorities wrote about the Sage's admission of error with no concern, seeming to take it for granted that such errors were possible.

Around the 16th century, something changed in the Jewish mentality and the familiar apologetics began. Instead of seeing the passage as a concession of an error on the part of the Sages, the Achronim put forward elaborate explanations including such favorites as "the natural order has changed" and "the Sages were speaking in symbolic language." R. Yonasan Eybeschutz even attempts some wishy-washy relativism, arguing that the Jewish and gentiles scholars approached the facts of astronomy from two different frames of reference and therefore both sides were right.

I'm not sure how to explain the behavior of the Achronim, but I think its possible that some of the forces that are causing the slide to the right we speak about today were at work in their time as well. Today, Judaism is moving to the right (by which I mean it is becoming more superstition, less thoughtful, and more cowardly) because so many of the old familiar ways have been undone. We don't live in Europe anymore, and technology has changed the way we live and think. When things are unstable, we fall back on what's easy and familiar. The mysteries and magic of Judaism, including a belief in the infallibility and mofsos-making abilities of the Sages, are intellectual comfort food. They're meatloaf for the mind.  

Something else that happens in times of stress is the glorification of elders and previous eras. With the expulsions from Spain, Portugal, Sicily and some German cities at the end of the 15th century , the creation of the first ghetto in 1516 and the arrival of the first Yiddish book in 1534 it was obvious that the Jewish world had changed dramatically. Not coincidently, this is also when the era of the Rishonim ended. At that moment as Jews begin to think that their own sages were categorically different from the sages of the previous century, the idea of the Sages infallibility started to take root.  We live in a similar time today. The era of the achronim has just ended, we're building new communities, new "Torah centers" in Israel and America, and, like the Jews of the 16th century, we, too, are experiencing a slide to the right. 


Search for more information about the facts of history at 4torah.com.

Glen Beck vs the Jews

Right-wing media darling Glen Beck has made yet another unfortunate comment about the Jews and the Holocaust, this time falsely accusing George Soros of being a Holocaust collaborator who helped "send the Jews to the death camps."

George Soros was 13 years old when the Nazis invaded Hungary, his home country.

Two important statements of condemnation in which Beck's venality and dishonesty are revealed can be seen after the jump.

Catholic Church Recruiting More Priests to Deal with Dybbuks

Exorcists wanted: apply to Catholic Church

 "WASHINGTON (Reuters) – Wanted: a few good men to cast out devils. Overwhelmed with requests for exorcists, U.S. Roman Catholic bishops are holding a special training workshop in Baltimore this weekend to teach clerics the esoteric rite, the Catholic News Service reported. The church has signed up 56 bishops and 66 priests for the two-day workshop that began on Friday, seeking to boost the small group of just five or six American exorcists that the church currently has on its books.

 "There's this small group of priests who say they get requests from all over the continental U.S.," Bishop Thomas Paprocki of Springfield, Illinois, was quoted as saying. "Actually, each diocese should have its own" exorcist, he added.

Paprocki did not say why there was increased demand for exorcisms, which he noted were rarely performed. While solemnly regarded by the Catholic Church, exorcism is a staple of Hollywood fright films -- most notably the 1973 film "The Exorcist" -- and regarded by many as superstition that lends a chill frisson to festivals like Halloween. Catholic Church law stipulates that only properly trained priests can perform the rite -- and then only with the permission of their bishops. Possible signs of demonic possession include scratching, cutting, biting of the skin; profound displays of strength; and a strong or violent reaction to holy water."

Hat Tip C.A who writes: I scratch, bite my fingers when I'm stressed, but I've never been near any holy water.  Maybe I'm possessed!  Maybe the DovBear community needs to tell me whether I should worry or chill out.

Search for more information about dybbuks at 4torah.com.

Sunday, November 14, 2010

Attention all Jews: THE BRAZILIAN DYBBUK WAS A HOAX

Last year, I ignored the story of the guy from Brazil who fooled the famous Rav Batzri, and tricked him into attempting an exorcism because I knew it was a hoax. Dybbuks aren't real. However, as I learned from the comments on other blogs, there were lots and lots of Jews too stupid to recognize this.

Therefore, with special delight, I give you Rafi. G's report:


Search for more information about Nyah Nyah I told you so at 4torah.com.

Peek a Jew: Jews singing the National Anthem at Ballparks

Kol Achai at Shea
 

 Zevi Daniels at Oriel Park @Camden Yards
 

 Chai Notes from Jack M. Barrack Hebrew Academy at the Citizen Bank's in Philly

And in a similar vein:

Yoel Sharabi does Hatikva at Shea
 

 A hora with the Phillie Phanatic
 

 Some rabbi allows himself to be humiliated at Pac Bell in SF

Search for more information about [topic] at 4torah.com.

Friday, November 12, 2010

Vayetze Notes

Understanding Rashi
In a famous comment Rashi attempts to work out the dates of various events in Jacob's life; following a midrash, he says Jacob spent 14 years in the tents of Eiver. Shem is not mentioned*. Why? Basing himself on the verse, and "Jacob sat in tents" (plural) Rashi deduces that Shem and Ever each had their own academy. Shem, who survived the flood, was an opponent of the immoral behavior that caused it; Ever who lived during the time of the Tower of Babel was an opponent of the mistaken ideas about God that made such a thing possible. Jacob, who was on his way to live with an idol worshipper, went for fortification in the tents of Eiver. This, incidently, some say is why Abraham, the champion monotheist, is called an Ivri. (They're wrong, but its an intriguing idea)

*When Rivka goes to inquire about her pregnancy, some versions of Rashi exclude Eiver, but this is likely a scribal error; older versions say she went to them both.


Two way Torah
Is the ladder a message or vision, or is it simply part of an event that Yaakov witnessed? Also, where was the ladder? Some midrashim put it in Beer Saheva, others in Jerusaelm, yet the verse say he was in Bethel. Why?

Political midrashim
Uninterpreted, the ladder story sounds for all the world like a "ringing endorsement of the Temple built [in Bethel] by Yeravam to replace the one in Jerusalem." (lurker) Its the ultimate George-Washington-slept-here-story. Not only did the famous Patriarch spend the night on the future site of Yeravam's Temple, he also erected a marker and promised to build a house of worship on that very spot. The midrshaim that seek to put Jacob at Mount Moriah instead, or, in the case of the famous contracting-land midrash, to put him at both Moriah and simultaneously, sound for all the world like interpretive dances performed to escape/erase what the verses plainly say: Yaakov slept and dreamt in Bethel. More

Motif
- Per J.P. Fokkelman stones are Jacob's personal motif. He puts one under his head (or per Rashi alongside it) rolls another away from the well, and uses a pile to mark his treaty with Lavan.

- We have another betrothal scene this week, in which Jacob echoes his mother's superhuman feat of watering ten camels by rolling away a tremendous rock on his own. Jacob appears here as the antithesis of his father, who sent a surrogate to his own well-side betrothal scene, where the woman, not the man, performed the act of strength.
- We also have the undoing of the main Genesis motif: Over and over again the younger brother is pushed, or pushes, ahead of the older. This week Leah was pushed by her father ahead of her younger sister Leah.

- Rachel's plea to Jacob has the characteristics of other annunciation scenes, but instead of beseeching God, Rachel goes to her husband who tells her pointedly"Am I instead of God?" She then falls back on Sarah's strategy.


Incomplete teaching
We all were taught the Leah had eyes that were 
rackh tender from crying; the Targum Onkeles, however, reads rackh as beautiful. [A related post and classic comment thread in the life of the blog]



Word Play
As Berashis Rabba pointed out first, Lavan deceives Yaakov, just as Yaakov deceived Yitzchak. Yaakov was deprived by the darkness of his sense of sight just as his father was deprived by blindness. The point that the deception with brides is poetic justice for the deception with the blessings is driven home by Lavan who says "It is not done in OUR place to put the younger girl before the firstborn" referring to Leah, not as the "elder", but as the "bechirah." The suggestion is that maybe in YOUR place the younger jumps ahead, but not here.

Jacob waters (וַיַּשְׁק) the sheep, then kisses (וַיִּשַּׁק) Rachel. Elsewhere, Jacob's sheep are called "rechaylim." (Mar Gavriel)
Duda'im (mandrakes) is close to dodim (lovemaking)

Rachel names her second surrogate child Naftali which plays on 
naftulim grappling, suggesting a correspondence between her relationship with her older sister and Jacob's relationship with his own older sibling. Rachel's first spoken words however (Give me children or I am a dead woman) echo the first spoken words of Esav who said he would die without food. (Alter)


Numerology
The word "well" appears seven times in the story of Jacob and Rachel's meeting


Ambiguity
During the ladder episode, is the Lord standing over Jacob, or is he at the top of the ladder (which, Alter insists, is actually a ramp)?


Duplicity
Jacob's promise to God is characteristic of his habit of deal making. His pledges to create a place of worship for the Lord, and to tith his wealth is contingent and will be kept only "IF the Lord guards... and brings me back to my fathers house."

Muser
How is it that a fine Torah true Jew like Yaakov married sisters? More

Mysteries
The mandrake puzzles on many levels and so do the verses about maternal imprinting.

Bonus

Sponsored

An energy supply company is running a contest for people with houses in the Con-Edison or Orange and Rockland service areas. The winner gets a full winter of free heating, and the consolation prize, which is available to everyone, is the possibility of saving 10 percent on heating costs.

To find out if you have won, click here and enter. 
 

Kaarite Environmentalism

A guest post by Sofhamizrach

Rep. John Shimkus (R-Il) is a member of the Holy Cross Lutheran Church in Collinsville, Ill.  Its Mission Page states:
In addition to saying what our faith is, we also desire to live in such a way that our faith is also seen in our words and actions.
This credo is worth remembering as Juan Cole reminds us of a statement Rep. Shimkus made to the House Subcommittee on Energy and Environment in 2009.  His faith is certainly evident as he quotes the Noach story to "prove" that man, no matter how he tries, can ever destroy the world.  

Video below:


Rep. Shimkus, being a gentile and literalist, apparently doesn't know or care about Kohelet Rabba, which states:
“Consider the work of God; for who can make that straight which he hath made crooked.” (Kohelet 7:12)
When the Holy One, blessed be God, created the first man, God took him and led him round all the trees of the Garden of Eden, and said to him: ‘Behold my works, how beautiful and commendable they are! All that I have created, for your sake I created it. Pay heed that you do not corrupt and destroy my universe; for if you corrupt it, there is no one to repair it after you.’
(Besides, if Congress acted upon a literal reading of the book of Genesis, wouldn’t that violate the Anti-Establishment Clause?  It would essentially be asserting that the Bible is divinely written.)

The attitudes towards creation are going in completely different directions.  Shimkus is using religion as an insurance policy to continue doing what he wants to do.  In other words, we are so weak and meaningless that we can’t possibly have any permanent detrimental effects, so we might as well consume as much as we can.  There’s no ownership of creation, and there is, therefore no sense of responsibility towards it.  Interestingly, this also finds its way into public policy.  The belief in the Free Market essentially states that human behavior, left to its natural conclusions, will work itself out to everyone’s mutual benefit in the end, so the role of government is simply not to interfere.  We can consume as much as we want (tax cuts, no safety net), and assume that the universe works in such a way that it will never come back to hurt us.

On the other hand, I would argue that Kohelet Rabba teaches us that we do have more power – we actually can destroy creation.  That awareness of our power forces us to limit ourselves (again you can tell I’ve been rereading Niebuhr) and take on a humbler, custodial role, both in terms of the physical planet as well as in terms of policy-making.  We do have the power to destroy society, which is why the people (through their elected officials) have to remain vigilant in monitoring and balancing the various forces at work.


Search for more information about midrash vs mikrah  at 4torah.com.

Thursday, November 11, 2010

The Gay Orthodox Jews Video

Must see video:



A series of well spoken Orthodox Jews talk about what it was like to grow-up gay. These people are your friends and your neighbors, perhaps even your sons and your brothers. The fact that they were made to suffer by a close-minded community for the sake of a poorly constructed, badly understood, verse in Leviticus is absolutely unforgivable.  I say again, what I have said before: the Torah tells us not to do any number of things, but only homosexuals - who may not have even actually performed the forbidden act!! - are ostracized, humiliated, and despised. This is bigotry, plain and simple, and it is evil.

Search for more information about gay Jews at 4torah.com.

Are women allowed to learn Ramban?

A strange Cross Currents:
Face it. The Torah community does not provide many organized opportunities for women who have the skills and desire to study Torah textually. Women looking for that often face an uncomfortable choice. They either have to settle for presentations that are unchallenging and unsatisfying, or seek it out in programs whose hashkafa is way out of synch with their own. Why should a young woman who learned to love textual learning have to find it in an institution that offers women Talmud faculty members from JTS, or male teachers who speak about their misgivings about the authority of Chazal? --- RYA
Male teachers like Ibn Ezra, Maimonides, Shmuel Ben Hofni, Chai Gaon, Nachmonides, and R. Samson Rephael Hirsch?

All of these male teachers had misgivings about the authority of Chazal on matters outside of Halacha, and spoke about it openly. I know the "traditional community" doubts it and finds the suggestion appalling, but this is because they haven't studied the sources and are blithesomely unaware that the genuinely "traditional" position is not the one that they profess.


Search for more information about the true Mesorah at 4torah.com.

Breaking News: Matisyahu Solomon says Kupait Hair is Gezel Gamur!

The fact that Kupat Hair is as crooked as three-dollar bill should be no shock to anyone who has seen their absurd advertisments which, following the classic scam, guarantee blessings and miracles to anyone foolish enough to hand over some money. What's shocking is that Rabbi Matisyahu Solomon, the moshgiach at Bes Medrash Govoha, has allegedly called the organization a bunch of theives. Here's the moneyquote from the Lakewood Voice (and try not to guffaw at the writing)
In a shock to the readers, R’ Matisyahu Soloman said at a Shabbos seuda in Beth Medrash Gavoah (to the bochurim at the table) that what Kupat Ha’ir is doing is “gezel gamur”. He said that “a thousand” girls desperate for shiduchim had given their life savings to Kupat Ha’ir hoping for a yeshua, and then called him up crying when nothing came of it.
Nothing came of it? No kidding.

Other questions: Why do the so-called gdolim permit their names to be used on the Kupat Ha'ir solicitations. Why don't they scream bloody murder when such unfulfillable promises are made in their names? What kind of organization blatently lies to young people, and robs them of their savings, in the name of Torah?

What the Jewish world needs is a James Randi who can publicly expose these hucksters and con-men for the frauds that they are. Barring that we need Jewish parents to stop encouraging their children to believe in such nonsense. The idea that an ordinary human being can shower you with blessings in exchange for money is false, and has no basis in Judaism. For some reason this superstitious malarky has taken root in the Orthodox Jewish imagination. If the theives who are robbing single women of all their money are to be defeated the lie must be uprooted.

Hat tip: Bootsey Thorton



Search for more information about [topic] at 4torah.com.

Midterm Wrapup 3

The Onion sings the midterm election blues:
WASHINGTON—Dismayed by the fact that over the past 24 months they have not experienced the immediate short-term personal gain they had hoped for, Americans went to the polls Tuesday and, for the 112th consecutive time, elected the candidates they deserve. "It's my duty," Reading, PA resident Bethany Albertson said as she cast her ballot and joined the staggering majority of citizens who, like every single previous generation of voters, will reap exactly what they have sown. "I haven't seen much difference in my paycheck, and we need a voice for change in our government." Exit polls indicated most voters will be content with what they've got coming to them as long as they see sharp reductions in taxes, health care costs, home foreclosures, economic regulation, unemployment, and the national debt by the time the 112th Congress is halfway through its first legislative session






Search for more information about [topic] at 4torah.com.

Wednesday, November 10, 2010

Midterms WrapuUp 2

Hendrick Hertzberg sings the midterm election blues:

Frightened by joblessness, “the American people” rewarded the party that not only opposed the stimulus but also blocked the extension of unemployment benefits. Alarmed by a ballooning national debt, they rewarded the party that not only transformed budget surpluses into budget deficits but also proposes to inflate the debt by hundreds of billions with a permanent tax cut for the least needy two per cent. Frustrated by what they see as inaction, they rewarded the party that not only fought every effort to mitigate the crisis but also forced the watering down of whatever it couldn’t block.

Another part of the problem, it must be said, is public ignorance. An illuminating Bloomberg poll, taken the week before the election, found that some two-thirds of likely voters believed that, under Obama and the Democrats, middle-class taxes have gone up, the economy has shrunk, and the billions lent to banks under the Troubled Asset Relief Program are gone, never to be recovered. One might add to that list the public’s apparent conviction that illegal immigration is skyrocketing and that the health-care law will drive the deficit higher. Reality tells a different story. For ninety-five per cent of us, taxes are actually lower, cut by around four hundred dollars a year for individuals and twice that for families. (The stimulus provided other tax cuts for people of modest means, including a break for college tuition.) The economy has been growing, however feebly, for five straight quarters. Most of the TARP loans have been repaid and the rest soon will be, plus a modest profit for the Treasury. And the number of illegal immigrants fell by close to a million last year, thanks in part to more energetic border enforcement. The health-care law, the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office says, will bring the deficit down.

But why don’t “the American people” know these things?


Search for more information about [topic] at 4torah.com.

The president's enemies never rest

Now this is impressive. It's been less than 24 hours since the presidents address at the University of Indonesia and I've already received an email from the Committee to Destroy the President's Reputation which misrepresents his remarks and provides a bogus interpretation of what happened.

Here's an excerpt from the email:
Yesterday Obama praised Indonesia as tolerant and condemned Israel.
President Obama praised Indonesia as tolerant when just within the last year or so, Jews had to run away, afraid of terror threats against their synagogue. (Okay, I know only Muslims need protection and get to build mosques anywhere)
President Obama praised Indonesia as tolerant when Indonesia won’t recognize Judaism but recognizes other religions. (Can’t have that gutter religion soiling the country).
President Obama praised Indonesia as tolerant when it will not allow Israeli citizens into the country
And Israel is condemned in Indonesia by our President on the same day
Israel where our Holy Temple mountain is allowed to be controlled by the Muslims
I am sorry. The stench of hypocrisy and antiSemitismis too strong. It assaults us
And here's the reality:

The president delivered an address in which he used the word "tolerance" exactly twice. Here  are the two passages:
Because Indonesia is made up of thousands of islands, and hundreds of languages, and people from scores of regions and ethnic groups, my time here helped me appreciate the common humanity of all people. And while my stepfather, like most Indonesians, was raised a Muslim, he firmly believed that all religions were worthy of respect. And in this way -- (applause) -- in this way he reflected the spirit of religious tolerance that is enshrined in Indonesia’s Constitution, and that remains one of this country’s defining and inspiring characteristics. (Applause.)
-snip -
But even as this land of my youth has changed in so many ways, those things that I learned to love about Indonesia -- that spirit of tolerance that is written into your Constitution; symbolized in mosques and churches and temples standing alongside each other; that spirit that’s embodied in your people -- that still lives on. (Applause.) Bhinneka Tunggal Ika -- unity in diversity. (Applause.) This is the foundation of Indonesia’s example to the world, and this is why Indonesia will play such an important part in the 21st century.
Earlier in the day Obama spoke about Israel. His so called-criticism had nothing to do with religion (if it was criticism at all) and was an unscripted answer to a question at a press conference.
Last question on our side is Stephen Collinson of AFP.

Q Thank you, Mr. President. As the President [of Indonesia] mentioned, events in the Middle East are watched very closely here. Does Israel’s advanced planning for more than a thousand new homes in Jerusalem undermine trust between the parties and undermine your peace efforts?

PRESIDENT OBAMA: I have not -- I’ve been out of town, so I’m just seeing the press reports. I have not had a full briefing on Israel’s intentions and what they’ve communicated to our administration. But this kind of activity is never helpful when it comes to peace negotiations. And I’m concerned that we’re not seeing each side made the extra effort involved to get a breakthrough that could finally create a framework for a secure Israel living side and side -- side by side in peace with a sovereign Palestine.
Is this criticism? Did the president actually compliment Indonesia for its treatment of Jews? I honestly don't think so, but unlike the author of the WE HATE OBAMA email, I'm content to provide you with the source material, and let you decide for yourself.


Search for more information about polemics at 4torah.com.

WWaJD (What Would A Jew Do?)

A Guest Post By E. Fink

Sports-talk radio is abuzz over an incident that occurred a few weeks ago at a High-School football game in Connecticut.

Southington vs Manchester was tied at 14 at halftime. Some time during the first half, a Manchester player dropped his armband with the entire Manchester playbook and the codewords for each of those plays. A Southington player picked it up. The player gave the armband to his coach.

The coach used the information on the armband to stymie the Manchester offense and eventually won the game 28-14.

It seems to me that High-School sports are competitive as well as educational. This was a failed opportunity to educate on fairness, sportsmanship and winning the "right way". But what of the competition aspect? Is this ethical? Is this cheating? Is there a space between cheating and unethical behavior? All good questions.

The biggest question for me is, how do we treat sports? Meaning, sports have their own rules, do the rules of the real world apply during the game? Or are the real world rules suspended during the game and as long as you follow the rules of the game you are doing the right thing?

So, what would do you think? What would you do?

(The coach was suspended for one game)
(And his brother plays for the Patriots, home of the cheating coaches)

Search for more information about cheating in sports at 4torah.com.