So long as we see no ankles I guess anything goes

This racy advertisement has been brought to you by the people who ban the appearance of all leg skin, and refuse to print photos of females in their publications:

Though not technically incorrect, the sentence brings to mind something unseemly. The same might be said of  sock-less girls: Technically, there isn't anything wrong with it; yet some worry about the thoughts such an image might bring to mind*. I think its odd that no main-stream newspaper would publish this ad -- and for specifically that reason -- yet, it flies right under the radar at the self-congratulatory pious papers, who are ultra strict about other things.

Related
HT: Amshonover (who else)

* If you're repressed, unhinged, sheltered, or just a plain old pervert: I don't think ordinary people are driven wild by women without socks; nor do I think the word "erection" makes anyone but a 12 year old giggle. Just if you're going to be a pious paper, be a consistently pious paper.

---

Search for more information about [topic] at 4torah.com.