JMM:
Part of me can't help but appreciate the irony of a White House which took the country to war on shaky (and later discredited) evidence going to war against a news organization that published a short article on shaky evidence...
Meanwhile, White House says move [i.e., Newsweek's retraction] 'a good first step,' but demands more action."
A question. What "more action" should a White House ever be in a position to demand after a story has been retracted, especially in a case where the White House is not even directly involved in the facts of the case?